COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION MODALITIES BASED ON A GAUSSIAN SCORE MODEL AND ERROR-RATE METRICS

The paper systematises the architecture and error-rate metrics of biometric identification systems. Using a Gaussian score model, heterogeneous published FAR, FRR and EER values are converted into separability indices with confidence intervals, and the dependence of identification errors on gallery size is derived. Iris recognition shows the highest separability (d′ = 7.44), whereas estimates obtained on small samples prove unreliable. For a gallery of 106 identities, keeping FPIR at or below 1% requires FMR ≈ 10−8, which no single modality in the analysed data provides; within the Gaussian model and under the assumption of independent scores, fusion of iris and fingerprint gives a theoretical separability sufficient for this requirement (d′ ≈ 8.50). The study relies on published data, and its results require experimental confirmation on a single biometric dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23228066
Primary Topic
Biometric Identification and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION MODALITIES BASED ON A GAUSSIAN SCORE MODEL AND ERROR-RATE METRICS

Saida Tastanova, Feruza Sodik kizi Ortikova
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Biometric Identification and Security
article

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION MODALITIES BASED ON A GAUSSIAN SCORE MODEL AND ERROR-RATE METRICS

Saida Tastanova, Feruza Sodik kizi Ortikova
article en

Abstract

The paper systematises the architecture and error-rate metrics of biometric identification systems. Using a Gaussian score model, heterogeneous published FAR, FRR and EER values are converted into separability indices with confidence intervals, and the dependence of identification errors on gallery size is derived. Iris recognition shows the highest separability (d′ = 7.44), whereas estimates obtained on small samples prove unreliable. For a gallery of 106 identities, keeping FPIR at or below 1% requires FMR ≈ 10−8, which no single modality in the analysed data provides; within the Gaussian model and under the assumption of independent scores, fusion of iris and fingerprint gives a theoretical separability sufficient for this requirement (d′ ≈ 8.50). The study relies on published data, and its results require experimental confirmation on a single biometric dataset.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tashkent University of Information Technology (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Biometric Identification and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION MODALITIES BASED ON A GAUSSIAN SCORE MODEL AND ERROR-RATE METRICS — Saida Tastanova, Feruza Sodik kizi Ortikova · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS