Temporal dynamics of multidimensional engagement in gamified and traditional flipped classrooms: behavioral, cognitive, and emotional trajectories

Purpose Existing research on gamified flipped classrooms (GFC) has often treated engagement as an overall outcome, leaving limited understanding of how behavioral, cognitive and emotional engagement change over time. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction (FPI), this three-wave quasi-experimental mixed-methods study examined engagement trajectories among undergraduate software engineering students in gamified and traditional flipped classrooms across a 16-week semester. Findings Questionnaire data and post-intervention interviews showed limited and non-sustained differences between the two instructional conditions. More importantly, behavioral engagement remained comparatively stable and cognitive engagement showed only limited temporal variation, whereas emotional engagement was relatively more sensitive to time. Qualitative findings indicated that behavioral engagement was largely maintained by instructional routines and task requirements, cognitive engagement was shaped by pragmatic task-oriented strategies and emotional engagement was more responsive to changing course experiences. Research limitations/implications These findings demonstrate that engagement dimensions do not necessarily develop uniformly within the same instructional environment and support a dimension-sensitive approach to GFC design. Originality/value This study extends GFC research by moving beyond overall or short-term measures of student engagement to examine the semester-long trajectories of behavioral, cognitive and emotional engagement simultaneously. The findings show that these engagement dimensions do not develop uniformly: behavioral engagement remains relatively stable and cognitive engagement shows limited temporal variation, whereas emotional engagement is comparatively more time-sensitive. By integrating SDT with Merrill’s FPI and combining three-wave quantitative data with qualitative explanations, the study provides a dimension-sensitive and temporally informed understanding of how gamification operates within structured flipped classrooms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Learning Sciences
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-01-2026-0008
Primary Topic
Educational Games and Gamification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal dynamics of multidimensional engagement in gamified and traditional flipped classrooms: behavioral, cognitive, and emotional trajectories

Mohd Shahril Nizam Shaharom, Kenny Cheah Soon Lee, YuXuan Xin
Information and Learning Sciences
Educational Games and Gamification
article

Temporal dynamics of multidimensional engagement in gamified and traditional flipped classrooms: behavioral, cognitive, and emotional trajectories

Mohd Shahril Nizam Shaharom, Kenny Cheah Soon Lee, YuXuan Xin
article en

Abstract

Purpose Existing research on gamified flipped classrooms (GFC) has often treated engagement as an overall outcome, leaving limited understanding of how behavioral, cognitive and emotional engagement change over time. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction (FPI), this three-wave quasi-experimental mixed-methods study examined engagement trajectories among undergraduate software engineering students in gamified and traditional flipped classrooms across a 16-week semester. Findings Questionnaire data and post-intervention interviews showed limited and non-sustained differences between the two instructional conditions. More importantly, behavioral engagement remained comparatively stable and cognitive engagement showed only limited temporal variation, whereas emotional engagement was relatively more sensitive to time. Qualitative findings indicated that behavioral engagement was largely maintained by instructional routines and task requirements, cognitive engagement was shaped by pragmatic task-oriented strategies and emotional engagement was more responsive to changing course experiences. Research limitations/implications These findings demonstrate that engagement dimensions do not necessarily develop uniformly within the same instructional environment and support a dimension-sensitive approach to GFC design. Originality/value This study extends GFC research by moving beyond overall or short-term measures of student engagement to examine the semester-long trajectories of behavioral, cognitive and emotional engagement simultaneously. The findings show that these engagement dimensions do not develop uniformly: behavioral engagement remains relatively stable and cognitive engagement shows limited temporal variation, whereas emotional engagement is comparatively more time-sensitive. By integrating SDT with Merrill’s FPI and combining three-wave quantitative data with qualitative explanations, the study provides a dimension-sensitive and temporally informed understanding of how gamification operates within structured flipped classrooms.

Information and Learning Sciences
University of Malaya (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Games and Gamification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.