Variation Exists Among Asia Pacific and American Surgeons in the Treatment of Pediatric Tibial Eminence Fractures

Purpose To compare operative and nonoperative management strategies, fixation preferences, postoperative immobilization protocols, and approaches to managing postoperative complications among Asia Pacific (APAC) and North American surgeons. Methods An online survey was distributed to orthopaedic surgeons within the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine APAC group between January 2023 and June 2024. The survey, which is a modified version of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) survey, assessed surgeon demographics, treatment strategies, risk factors for postoperative arthrofibrosis, and responses to clinical vignettes. Results Fifty‐six out of 127 APAC surgeons responded to the survey. Compared with POSNA surgeons, APAC respondents were more likely to perform arthroscopic reduction and transphyseal suture fixation for type II (89.3% vs 37.4%, P < .001) tibial spine fracture regardless of patient's age. APAC surgeons also favored longer postoperative immobilization periods (14.3% vs 24.5%, P = .023) and identified time from injury to surgery (76.8% vs 31.9%, P < .001) as the main risk factor for arthrofibrosis. APAC surgeons were also more likely to manage early postoperative range‐of‐motion restriction nonoperatively with continued physiotherapy, whereas POSNA surgeons leaned toward arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (53.6% vs 33.6%, P = .015). Conclusions Although there was a 5‐year gap between surveys, APAC surgeons were more likely than POSNA surgeons to perform arthroscopic reduction and transphyseal suture fixation for type 2 tibial spine fracture, favored longer postoperative immobilization, more frequently identified time from injury to surgery as the primary risk factor for arthrofibrosis, and were more inclined to manage early postoperative range‐of‐motion restriction nonoperatively. Clinical Relevance Understanding regional differences in the management of tibial spine fractures may help identify areas of consensus and variation, inform best‐practice guidelines, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70099
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation Exists Among Asia Pacific and American Surgeons in the Treatment of Pediatric Tibial Eminence Fractures

Khin Yee Sammy Loh, Xinyi Lim, James Hoi Po Hui, Chih‐Kai Hong et al.
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Variation Exists Among Asia Pacific and American Surgeons in the Treatment of Pediatric Tibial Eminence Fractures

Khin Yee Sammy Loh, Xinyi Lim, James Hoi Po Hui, Chih‐Kai Hong, Theodore John Ganley
article en

Abstract

Purpose To compare operative and nonoperative management strategies, fixation preferences, postoperative immobilization protocols, and approaches to managing postoperative complications among Asia Pacific (APAC) and North American surgeons. Methods An online survey was distributed to orthopaedic surgeons within the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine APAC group between January 2023 and June 2024. The survey, which is a modified version of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) survey, assessed surgeon demographics, treatment strategies, risk factors for postoperative arthrofibrosis, and responses to clinical vignettes. Results Fifty‐six out of 127 APAC surgeons responded to the survey. Compared with POSNA surgeons, APAC respondents were more likely to perform arthroscopic reduction and transphyseal suture fixation for type II (89.3% vs 37.4%, P < .001) tibial spine fracture regardless of patient's age. APAC surgeons also favored longer postoperative immobilization periods (14.3% vs 24.5%, P = .023) and identified time from injury to surgery (76.8% vs 31.9%, P < .001) as the main risk factor for arthrofibrosis. APAC surgeons were also more likely to manage early postoperative range‐of‐motion restriction nonoperatively with continued physiotherapy, whereas POSNA surgeons leaned toward arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (53.6% vs 33.6%, P = .015). Conclusions Although there was a 5‐year gap between surveys, APAC surgeons were more likely than POSNA surgeons to perform arthroscopic reduction and transphyseal suture fixation for type 2 tibial spine fracture, favored longer postoperative immobilization, more frequently identified time from injury to surgery as the primary risk factor for arthrofibrosis, and were more inclined to manage early postoperative range‐of‐motion restriction nonoperatively. Clinical Relevance Understanding regional differences in the management of tibial spine fractures may help identify areas of consensus and variation, inform best‐practice guidelines, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), National University of Singapore (SG), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), National University Hospital (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.