From Parameter Space to Structure Space: A Knowledge Formalization Compilation Framework for LLMs Based on Daopology—GlyphCode—GlyphCode Reasoner

Large language models (LLMs) face a fundamental contradiction in knowledge acquisition and transfer: knowledge is stored implicitly in distributed parameters, making it difficult for humans to directly read, verify, or transfer it across models. This leads to repeated and costly post-training for each model iteration. This paper proposes a theoretical framework that compiles LLM knowledge into explicit structural entities that are both human-readable and machine-reasonable. The framework integrates three core components: Daopology, which provides a structured coordinate system for knowledge (79 minimal expressive parameters); GlyphCode, which offers a universal symbolic encoding system for structural entities; and the GlyphCode Reasoner, which serves as a neuro-symbolic inference engine. We further design a fully automated knowledge extraction and verification pipeline based on multi-LLM interaction and validation, replacing traditional manual knowledge engineering.In particular, we reposition existing knowledge graphs as dictionaries and indexes, and vector databases as semantic indexing and retrieval layers. We propose a “two-end alignment, bidirectional compilation” engineering architecture in which Daopology serves as the structural core (substance), while knowledge graphs, vector databases, and ontology systems serve as infrastructure (function). Through forward compilation (structure → graph/vector) and backward compilation (graph/vector → structure), bidirectional mapping is achieved. The system actively discovers knowledge that is completely absent in graphs but may exist in LLMs, extracts it through multi-LLM cross-validation into Daopology structures, and thereby enriches and perfects the knowledge base.Quantitative analysis based on existing empirical data shows that the startup cost of this framework can be controlled at the level of several thousand USD. It achieves approximately 48% information retention on comprehension-intensive tasks and up to 94.2% in domain knowledge injection scenarios. Compared with the original LLM paradigm of repeated training and inference, computational cost is reduced by 1–2 orders of magnitude, and development time is shortened by 60%–90%. The core conclusion is: LLMs provide experience, Daopology provides coordinates, GlyphCode provides encoding, the GlyphCode Reasoner provides inference, and graphs and vector stores provide indexing—five components working together to transform knowledge from “unreadable parameters” into “auditable, transferable, augmentable, and growable” structures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23226882
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

From Parameter Space to Structure Space: A Knowledge Formalization Compilation Framework for LLMs Based on Daopology—GlyphCode—GlyphCode Reasoner

张宝元
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topic Modeling
preprint

From Parameter Space to Structure Space: A Knowledge Formalization Compilation Framework for LLMs Based on Daopology—GlyphCode—GlyphCode Reasoner

张宝元
preprint en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) face a fundamental contradiction in knowledge acquisition and transfer: knowledge is stored implicitly in distributed parameters, making it difficult for humans to directly read, verify, or transfer it across models. This leads to repeated and costly post-training for each model iteration. This paper proposes a theoretical framework that compiles LLM knowledge into explicit structural entities that are both human-readable and machine-reasonable. The framework integrates three core components: Daopology, which provides a structured coordinate system for knowledge (79 minimal expressive parameters); GlyphCode, which offers a universal symbolic encoding system for structural entities; and the GlyphCode Reasoner, which serves as a neuro-symbolic inference engine. We further design a fully automated knowledge extraction and verification pipeline based on multi-LLM interaction and validation, replacing traditional manual knowledge engineering.In particular, we reposition existing knowledge graphs as dictionaries and indexes, and vector databases as semantic indexing and retrieval layers. We propose a “two-end alignment, bidirectional compilation” engineering architecture in which Daopology serves as the structural core (substance), while knowledge graphs, vector databases, and ontology systems serve as infrastructure (function). Through forward compilation (structure → graph/vector) and backward compilation (graph/vector → structure), bidirectional mapping is achieved. The system actively discovers knowledge that is completely absent in graphs but may exist in LLMs, extracts it through multi-LLM cross-validation into Daopology structures, and thereby enriches and perfects the knowledge base.Quantitative analysis based on existing empirical data shows that the startup cost of this framework can be controlled at the level of several thousand USD. It achieves approximately 48% information retention on comprehension-intensive tasks and up to 94.2% in domain knowledge injection scenarios. Compared with the original LLM paradigm of repeated training and inference, computational cost is reduced by 1–2 orders of magnitude, and development time is shortened by 60%–90%. The core conclusion is: LLMs provide experience, Daopology provides coordinates, GlyphCode provides encoding, the GlyphCode Reasoner provides inference, and graphs and vector stores provide indexing—five components working together to transform knowledge from “unreadable parameters” into “auditable, transferable, augmentable, and growable” structures.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.