Non-medical drivers of health and pediatric no-show prediction: identifying modifiable risk factors

Abstract Background No-shows to medical appointments contribute to disruptions and inefficiencies in healthcare delivery. While artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) models are increasingly used to predict no-shows, few have incorporated non-medical drivers of health (NMDOH), particularly in pediatric populations. This study evaluated the inclusion of NMDOH in pediatric AI/ML no-show prediction and identified modifiable factors associated with no-shows. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of scheduled pediatric appointments across six general pediatrics clinics during April–August 2024 using electronic health record and NMDOH screening data. A transformer-based AI/ML no-show model was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with no-show status. Results Among 7,931 included appointments, 2761 (34.8%) were no-shows. Models with and without NMDOH variables showed similar performance (AUROC 0.708 for both; AUPRC 0.536 vs. 0.535, respectively). Inclusion of patient demographic and insurance variables produced a small improvement in performance, with similar results with and without NMDOH inclusion (AUROC 0.721 and AUPRC 0.542 for both). No-shows were associated with unconfirmed appointments, non-active patient portal status, transportation needs, and housing instability. Conclusions NMDOH variables did not significantly change model performance but identified actionable factors associated with no-shows. Prediction models may be most useful when paired with targeted outreach and barrier-reduction strategies. Impact Non-medical drivers of health (NMDOH), including transportation needs and housing instability, as well as appointment confirmation and patient portal activation, were associated with missed pediatric appointments. Inclusion of NMDOH in AI/ML no-show prediction models did not meaningfully change prediction performance. The associations highlight modifiable barriers that can be targeted through clinical and operational interventions. AI-based no-show prediction may be most effective when paired with outreach and barrier-reduction strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Research
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-026-05531-1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-medical drivers of health and pediatric no-show prediction: identifying modifiable risk factors

Sarah Cavenaugh, Sandra McKay, Ashley Gibson, Linh Nguyen et al.
Pediatric Research
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Non-medical drivers of health and pediatric no-show prediction: identifying modifiable risk factors

Sarah Cavenaugh, Sandra McKay, Ashley Gibson, Linh Nguyen, Christopher Kulesza, Yen-Chi Le, Lishan Yu, Xiaoqian Jiang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background No-shows to medical appointments contribute to disruptions and inefficiencies in healthcare delivery. While artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) models are increasingly used to predict no-shows, few have incorporated non-medical drivers of health (NMDOH), particularly in pediatric populations. This study evaluated the inclusion of NMDOH in pediatric AI/ML no-show prediction and identified modifiable factors associated with no-shows. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of scheduled pediatric appointments across six general pediatrics clinics during April–August 2024 using electronic health record and NMDOH screening data. A transformer-based AI/ML no-show model was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with no-show status. Results Among 7,931 included appointments, 2761 (34.8%) were no-shows. Models with and without NMDOH variables showed similar performance (AUROC 0.708 for both; AUPRC 0.536 vs. 0.535, respectively). Inclusion of patient demographic and insurance variables produced a small improvement in performance, with similar results with and without NMDOH inclusion (AUROC 0.721 and AUPRC 0.542 for both). No-shows were associated with unconfirmed appointments, non-active patient portal status, transportation needs, and housing instability. Conclusions NMDOH variables did not significantly change model performance but identified actionable factors associated with no-shows. Prediction models may be most useful when paired with targeted outreach and barrier-reduction strategies. Impact Non-medical drivers of health (NMDOH), including transportation needs and housing instability, as well as appointment confirmation and patient portal activation, were associated with missed pediatric appointments. Inclusion of NMDOH in AI/ML no-show prediction models did not meaningfully change prediction performance. The associations highlight modifiable barriers that can be targeted through clinical and operational interventions. AI-based no-show prediction may be most effective when paired with outreach and barrier-reduction strategies.

Pediatric Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.