Novel use of far UV-C light as a surface disinfectant in the poultry industry: trials on broiler farms show reduced bacterial burden in poultry anterooms and on wellington boots

Abstract Far ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation at 222 nm has widely been shown to deactivate bacteria, viruses and fungi in in-vitro experiments. However, there are few studies testing the technology on real life surface. There are no peer reviewed studies on the efficacy and feasibility of far UV-C disinfection in real-life agricultural settings. The aim of this study was to investigate whether far UV-C irradiation installations on UK broiler poultry farms could reduce bacterial surface burden. On two farms one pair of wellington boots was submitted to far UV-C irradiation at 222 nm after staff exiting the bird housing, using a purpose build disinfection box. Swabs ( n = 780) were taken from the bottom side of the soles before and after irradiation and from a pair of non-irradiated control boots. In a separate trial wall mounted Far UV-C systems were installed in a poultry anteroom and vestibule. Swabs ( n = 615) were taken from irradiated and non-irradiated (control) anteroom floors divided into 4 zones (L1-4), vestibule floors divided into 2 zones (V1, V2) and walls divided into 2 zones (VW1, VW2) and the door handle (VD) leading to bird housing. For both studies surface swabs were taken twice a week during the first 4–5 weeks of a bird crop. This was repeated over 3–4 and 4–5 crops for the wellington trial and the poultry anteroom trial respectively. Swabs were plated in the laboratory and the number colony forming units (cfu’s) were determined. Overall, there was a significant cfu reduction between treatments ( p < 0.001), after wellington boot exposure to far UV-C irradiation compared to pre-exposure cfu counts and cfu’s on control boots. Despite some technical challenges, across most anteroom and vestibule sampling locations, cfu’s from swabs taken from far UV-C irradiated areas were significantly lower than cfu’s from control area swabs. Far UV-C irradiation in livestock settings could be a promising added biosecurity layer on broiler farms and could be applicable to a range of livestock systems. Further research and development is required in areas such as installation adaptations to farms systems and settings, feasibility of implementation and cost benefit analyses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry science and management.
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44364-026-00048-z
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel use of far UV-C light as a surface disinfectant in the poultry industry: trials on broiler farms show reduced bacterial burden in poultry anterooms and on wellington boots

Katharina Watson, S. Green, D. Francis, C. Laudham et al.
Poultry science and management.
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Novel use of far UV-C light as a surface disinfectant in the poultry industry: trials on broiler farms show reduced bacterial burden in poultry anterooms and on wellington boots

Katharina Watson, S. Green, D. Francis, C. Laudham, S. Daniels
article en

Abstract

Abstract Far ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation at 222 nm has widely been shown to deactivate bacteria, viruses and fungi in in-vitro experiments. However, there are few studies testing the technology on real life surface. There are no peer reviewed studies on the efficacy and feasibility of far UV-C disinfection in real-life agricultural settings. The aim of this study was to investigate whether far UV-C irradiation installations on UK broiler poultry farms could reduce bacterial surface burden. On two farms one pair of wellington boots was submitted to far UV-C irradiation at 222 nm after staff exiting the bird housing, using a purpose build disinfection box. Swabs ( n = 780) were taken from the bottom side of the soles before and after irradiation and from a pair of non-irradiated control boots. In a separate trial wall mounted Far UV-C systems were installed in a poultry anteroom and vestibule. Swabs ( n = 615) were taken from irradiated and non-irradiated (control) anteroom floors divided into 4 zones (L1-4), vestibule floors divided into 2 zones (V1, V2) and walls divided into 2 zones (VW1, VW2) and the door handle (VD) leading to bird housing. For both studies surface swabs were taken twice a week during the first 4–5 weeks of a bird crop. This was repeated over 3–4 and 4–5 crops for the wellington trial and the poultry anteroom trial respectively. Swabs were plated in the laboratory and the number colony forming units (cfu’s) were determined. Overall, there was a significant cfu reduction between treatments ( p < 0.001), after wellington boot exposure to far UV-C irradiation compared to pre-exposure cfu counts and cfu’s on control boots. Despite some technical challenges, across most anteroom and vestibule sampling locations, cfu’s from swabs taken from far UV-C irradiated areas were significantly lower than cfu’s from control area swabs. Far UV-C irradiation in livestock settings could be a promising added biosecurity layer on broiler farms and could be applicable to a range of livestock systems. Further research and development is required in areas such as installation adaptations to farms systems and settings, feasibility of implementation and cost benefit analyses.

Poultry science and management.Vol. 3(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.