Eating speed in complementary fed infants: associations with energy intake, weight status, breastfeeding, baby food pouch use and baby-led weaning

Abstract Background Although eating quickly may promote excess energy intake and is associated with unhealthy weight in children, little research has investigated eating speed in infants. Objective To describe relationships between eating speed and energy intake, weight status and feeding practices in infants aged 7–10 months. Methods Eating speed was assessed in 625 infants (First Foods New Zealand observational study) using three methods: (i) two 24-h diet recalls; (ii) the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire ‘slowness in eating’ subscale; and (iii) one filmed eating occasion ( n = 205). The recalls also measured daily energy intake from complementary food. Infant length and weight were measured, and body mass index (BMI) z-scores calculated (WHO Child Growth Standards). Data on baby food pouch use, baby-led weaning (BLW) and breastfeeding were collected by questionnaire. Infants were defined as ‘frequent pouch users’ if they consumed food from a pouch 5+ times/week during the past month. ‘Full’ BLW was defined as the infant ‘mostly’ or ‘always’ feeding themselves. Results Slower eating was associated with lower energy intake from complementary food (mean difference: −125 kJ/day, 95% CI [−178, −71] for each 1 unit increase in ‘slowness in eating’ score). Compared to spoon-fed infants, ‘full’ BLW infants were slower eaters (diet recall, adjusted mean difference, −3 kJ/min [−6, −1]; video, −14 kJ/min [−23, −5]; ‘slowness in eating’, standardised mean difference, 0.6 SD [0.5, 0.8], indicating a moderate effect). Breastfed infants ate more slowly than formula-fed infants (diet recall, adjusted mean difference, −3 kJ/min [−6, −1]; video, −9 kJ/min [−17, −1]; ‘slowness in eating’, standardised mean difference, 0.3 SD [0.1, 0.5]). Conclusions Slower eating in infancy is associated with breastfeeding and lower daily energy intake from complementary food, but not weight status or frequent pouch use. Infants who usually feed themselves are slower eaters than those who are usually spoon-fed. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ACTRN12620000459921; website: http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379436 ).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-026-02234-9
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eating speed in complementary fed infants: associations with energy intake, weight status, breastfeeding, baby food pouch use and baby-led weaning

Maria Casale, Rosario M. Jupiterwala, Ioanna Katiforis, Anne‐Louise M. Heath et al.
International Journal of Obesity
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
article

Eating speed in complementary fed infants: associations with energy intake, weight status, breastfeeding, baby food pouch use and baby-led weaning

Maria Casale, Rosario M. Jupiterwala, Ioanna Katiforis, Anne‐Louise M. Heath, Kimberley J. Brown, Neve H. McLean, Jillian Joy Haszard, Rachael Waring Taylor, Lisa Daniels, Pamela R. von Hurst, Cathryn Anne Conlon, Bailey R. Bruckner, Lisa Te Morenga, Alice M. Cox, Kathryn L. Beck, Emily A. Jones, Madeleine Rowan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Although eating quickly may promote excess energy intake and is associated with unhealthy weight in children, little research has investigated eating speed in infants. Objective To describe relationships between eating speed and energy intake, weight status and feeding practices in infants aged 7–10 months. Methods Eating speed was assessed in 625 infants (First Foods New Zealand observational study) using three methods: (i) two 24-h diet recalls; (ii) the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire ‘slowness in eating’ subscale; and (iii) one filmed eating occasion ( n = 205). The recalls also measured daily energy intake from complementary food. Infant length and weight were measured, and body mass index (BMI) z-scores calculated (WHO Child Growth Standards). Data on baby food pouch use, baby-led weaning (BLW) and breastfeeding were collected by questionnaire. Infants were defined as ‘frequent pouch users’ if they consumed food from a pouch 5+ times/week during the past month. ‘Full’ BLW was defined as the infant ‘mostly’ or ‘always’ feeding themselves. Results Slower eating was associated with lower energy intake from complementary food (mean difference: −125 kJ/day, 95% CI [−178, −71] for each 1 unit increase in ‘slowness in eating’ score). Compared to spoon-fed infants, ‘full’ BLW infants were slower eaters (diet recall, adjusted mean difference, −3 kJ/min [−6, −1]; video, −14 kJ/min [−23, −5]; ‘slowness in eating’, standardised mean difference, 0.6 SD [0.5, 0.8], indicating a moderate effect). Breastfed infants ate more slowly than formula-fed infants (diet recall, adjusted mean difference, −3 kJ/min [−6, −1]; video, −9 kJ/min [−17, −1]; ‘slowness in eating’, standardised mean difference, 0.3 SD [0.1, 0.5]). Conclusions Slower eating in infancy is associated with breastfeeding and lower daily energy intake from complementary food, but not weight status or frequent pouch use. Infants who usually feed themselves are slower eaters than those who are usually spoon-fed. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ACTRN12620000459921; website: http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379436 ).

International Journal of Obesity
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.