Can a work-relevance rationale support students’ utility value, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence? an exploratory, small-scale experiment in an online statistics course

Abstract Work relevance is increasingly emphasized in higher education, and instructors often explain how course content may be useful for future work to motivate students. Such work-relevance rationales may be common in quantitatively oriented courses that students find difficult or anxiety-provoking. However, experimental evidence regarding their motivational effects in higher education remains mixed, and little is known about potential psychological costs for students experiencing statistics anxiety. The present study was a small-scale exploratory field experiment examining an instructor-provided work-relevance rationale in a quantitative methods course. Specifically, it investigated whether the rationale influenced undergraduate psychology students’ utility value, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence. Seventy-six online students were assigned to a rationale or control condition and completed self-report measures following a short video intervention. Results showed no significant effects on utility value or autonomous motivation. Examination anxiety, a dimension of statistics anxiety, appeared to moderate the effect of the rationale on perceived competence, although this finding should be interpreted cautiously given the exploratory nature of the study and the uncertainty of the follow-up analyses. The pattern of results suggested that the rationale may be associated with lower perceived competence among students with higher examination anxiety. As an initial investigation of potential psychological costs of work-relevance rationales in online statistics education, the study identifies a theoretically and pedagogically important question for future research. If replicated in larger studies, the findings suggest that emphasizing work relevance may not be universally motivating and may have unintended negative consequences for students experiencing high evaluative anxiety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology of Education
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-026-10298-8
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can a work-relevance rationale support students’ utility value, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence? an exploratory, small-scale experiment in an online statistics course

Kjersti Nesje
Social Psychology of Education
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Can a work-relevance rationale support students’ utility value, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence? an exploratory, small-scale experiment in an online statistics course

Kjersti Nesje
article en

Abstract

Abstract Work relevance is increasingly emphasized in higher education, and instructors often explain how course content may be useful for future work to motivate students. Such work-relevance rationales may be common in quantitatively oriented courses that students find difficult or anxiety-provoking. However, experimental evidence regarding their motivational effects in higher education remains mixed, and little is known about potential psychological costs for students experiencing statistics anxiety. The present study was a small-scale exploratory field experiment examining an instructor-provided work-relevance rationale in a quantitative methods course. Specifically, it investigated whether the rationale influenced undergraduate psychology students’ utility value, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence. Seventy-six online students were assigned to a rationale or control condition and completed self-report measures following a short video intervention. Results showed no significant effects on utility value or autonomous motivation. Examination anxiety, a dimension of statistics anxiety, appeared to moderate the effect of the rationale on perceived competence, although this finding should be interpreted cautiously given the exploratory nature of the study and the uncertainty of the follow-up analyses. The pattern of results suggested that the rationale may be associated with lower perceived competence among students with higher examination anxiety. As an initial investigation of potential psychological costs of work-relevance rationales in online statistics education, the study identifies a theoretically and pedagogically important question for future research. If replicated in larger studies, the findings suggest that emphasizing work relevance may not be universally motivating and may have unintended negative consequences for students experiencing high evaluative anxiety.

Social Psychology of EducationVol. 29(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can a work-relevance rationale support students’ utility value, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence? an exploratory, small-scale experiment in an online statistics course — Kjersti Nesje · Social Psychology of Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS