Remote Identification of APOE-ε4 Carrier Status in Cognitively Normal Adults via Speech Acoustics: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

BACKGROUND Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE-ε4), the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD), is associated with early neuromotor vulnerability that may precede measurable cognitive decline. Because speech integrates fine neuromotor processes, acoustic analysis could offer a sensitive, noninvasive marker of preclinical effects. OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine if speech acoustics distinguish cognitively normal APOE-ε4 carriers from noncarriers, and to assess which speech tasks provide optimal classification performance. METHODS In this cross-sectional observational study, 80 cognitively normal adults aged 41 to 89 years (22 APOE-ε4 carriers and 58 noncarriers) completed sustained phonation, oral diadochokinetic syllable repetition, passage reading, and spontaneous-speech tasks. Speech samples were collected remotely using participants’ personal devices and processed to extract 88 acoustic features from the extended Geneva Minimalistic Acoustic Parameter Set. Task-specific random forest classifiers were developed to distinguish APOE-ε4 carriers from noncarriers. A genetic algorithm was used to select informative features, and model performance was evaluated using leave-one-participant-out cross-validation. Performance metrics included balanced accuracy, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS Spontaneous speech produced the strongest classification performance, with balanced accuracy of 0.84, accuracy of 0.89, sensitivity of 0.73, specificity of 0.95, F1-score of 0.78, and ROC-AUC of 0.75. Performance was lower for sustained phonation (F1-score=0.69), diadochokinetic syllable repetition (F1-score =0.70 for /ba/ and 0.64 for /pa/), and passage reading (F1-score=0.61). Combining recordings across tasks reduced performance (F1-score=0.53), indicating that task-specific acoustic patterns were more informative than pooled data. CONCLUSIONS Automated analysis of task-specific acoustic speech features, particularly spontaneous speech, internally distinguished cognitively normal APOE-ε4 carriers from noncarriers. These findings support further validation of speech acoustics as a low-burden digital biomarker of preclinical AD risk and suggest that spontaneous-speech tasks may be especially well suited for future remote and longitudinal assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/89830
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote Identification of APOE-ε4 Carrier Status in Cognitively Normal Adults via Speech Acoustics: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Mehrdad Dadgostar, Kathryn P. Connaghan, Nelson V. Barnett, Brian D. Richburg et al.
JMIR Formative Research
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Remote Identification of APOE-ε4 Carrier Status in Cognitively Normal Adults via Speech Acoustics: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Mehrdad Dadgostar, Kathryn P. Connaghan, Nelson V. Barnett, Brian D. Richburg, Marziye Eshghi, Maryam Tavakoli, David H. Salat, Jordan R. Green, Steven Edward Arnold, Mariam Tkeshelashvili
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE-ε4), the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD), is associated with early neuromotor vulnerability that may precede measurable cognitive decline. Because speech integrates fine neuromotor processes, acoustic analysis could offer a sensitive, noninvasive marker of preclinical effects. OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine if speech acoustics distinguish cognitively normal APOE-ε4 carriers from noncarriers, and to assess which speech tasks provide optimal classification performance. METHODS In this cross-sectional observational study, 80 cognitively normal adults aged 41 to 89 years (22 APOE-ε4 carriers and 58 noncarriers) completed sustained phonation, oral diadochokinetic syllable repetition, passage reading, and spontaneous-speech tasks. Speech samples were collected remotely using participants’ personal devices and processed to extract 88 acoustic features from the extended Geneva Minimalistic Acoustic Parameter Set. Task-specific random forest classifiers were developed to distinguish APOE-ε4 carriers from noncarriers. A genetic algorithm was used to select informative features, and model performance was evaluated using leave-one-participant-out cross-validation. Performance metrics included balanced accuracy, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS Spontaneous speech produced the strongest classification performance, with balanced accuracy of 0.84, accuracy of 0.89, sensitivity of 0.73, specificity of 0.95, F1-score of 0.78, and ROC-AUC of 0.75. Performance was lower for sustained phonation (F1-score=0.69), diadochokinetic syllable repetition (F1-score =0.70 for /ba/ and 0.64 for /pa/), and passage reading (F1-score=0.61). Combining recordings across tasks reduced performance (F1-score=0.53), indicating that task-specific acoustic patterns were more informative than pooled data. CONCLUSIONS Automated analysis of task-specific acoustic speech features, particularly spontaneous speech, internally distinguished cognitively normal APOE-ε4 carriers from noncarriers. These findings support further validation of speech acoustics as a low-burden digital biomarker of preclinical AD risk and suggest that spontaneous-speech tasks may be especially well suited for future remote and longitudinal assessment.

JMIR Formative ResearchVol. 10
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.