Sensitivity to change and meaningful difference threshold of the quick motor function test in late onset Pompe disease

Abstract Background The Quick Motor Function Test (QMFT), a 16-item observer-rated scale, assesses motor function in Pompe disease. This study evaluated QMFT’s sensitivity to detect clinical changes and estimated its thresholds for a meaningful difference. Methods Using blinded data from the COMET trial (NCT02782741; registration date: May 25, 2016) in late-onset Pompe disease, we analyzed QMFT’s sensitivity to change from baseline to Week 49. Spearman and polyserial correlations of changes between QMFT and clinical outcome assessments (COAs) were examined, with 95% confidence intervals estimated by bootstrap resampling. Using Kruskal-Wallis analysis, we examined the distribution of QMFT total score changes across three response groups (Improvement, No Change, Worsening) based on other collected and theoretically related COAs as external anchors. Meaningful difference was determined through both anchor-based approaches (using correlations ≥ 0.371) and distribution-based methods, including standard error of measurement (SEM), 0.5 standard deviation (SD), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results QMFT demonstrated sensitivity to change. Correlations between QMFT and other COAs ranged from |0.14| to |0.39|. Changes in QMFT followed expected patterns among the three response groups. For patients showing any improvement on COAs, anchor-based meaningful difference in QMFT ranged from 4.0 to 8.0 points. Distribution-based estimates yielded similar thresholds for QMFT of 3.9 points (SEM), 5.2 points (0.5SD), and 10.9 points (MDC). Conclusions This study evaluated the QMFT sensitivity to change and defined meaningful difference at which a patient perceives an improvement in their well-being. These data can inform interpretation of QMFT changes in clinical and research setting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-026-04649-z
Primary Topic
Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity to change and meaningful difference threshold of the quick motor function test in late onset Pompe disease

Atef Zaher, Pronabesh DasMahapatra, Nadine A. M. E. van der Beek, Ans T. van der Ploeg et al.
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
article

Sensitivity to change and meaningful difference threshold of the quick motor function test in late onset Pompe disease

Atef Zaher, Pronabesh DasMahapatra, Nadine A. M. E. van der Beek, Ans T. van der Ploeg, Michelle Elisabeth Kruijshaar, Kristina An Haack, Kenneth I. Berger, Nicole M. Armstrong, Christina Daskalopoulou, Aleksandra Sjöström-Bujacz, Dimitrios-Paraskevas Papageorgiou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Quick Motor Function Test (QMFT), a 16-item observer-rated scale, assesses motor function in Pompe disease. This study evaluated QMFT’s sensitivity to detect clinical changes and estimated its thresholds for a meaningful difference. Methods Using blinded data from the COMET trial (NCT02782741; registration date: May 25, 2016) in late-onset Pompe disease, we analyzed QMFT’s sensitivity to change from baseline to Week 49. Spearman and polyserial correlations of changes between QMFT and clinical outcome assessments (COAs) were examined, with 95% confidence intervals estimated by bootstrap resampling. Using Kruskal-Wallis analysis, we examined the distribution of QMFT total score changes across three response groups (Improvement, No Change, Worsening) based on other collected and theoretically related COAs as external anchors. Meaningful difference was determined through both anchor-based approaches (using correlations ≥ 0.371) and distribution-based methods, including standard error of measurement (SEM), 0.5 standard deviation (SD), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results QMFT demonstrated sensitivity to change. Correlations between QMFT and other COAs ranged from |0.14| to |0.39|. Changes in QMFT followed expected patterns among the three response groups. For patients showing any improvement on COAs, anchor-based meaningful difference in QMFT ranged from 4.0 to 8.0 points. Distribution-based estimates yielded similar thresholds for QMFT of 3.9 points (SEM), 5.2 points (0.5SD), and 10.9 points (MDC). Conclusions This study evaluated the QMFT sensitivity to change and defined meaningful difference at which a patient perceives an improvement in their well-being. These data can inform interpretation of QMFT changes in clinical and research setting.

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.