Does good governance moderate the relationship between CEO overconfidence and corporate environmental disclosure? International evidence

Purpose This paper aimed to shed light on the relationship between managerial overconfidence and corporate environmental disclosure and whether this relationship is moderated by good governance. Design/methodology/approach The sample includes 1395 international firms listed on the ESG index for the period 2010–2023. The feasible generalized least squares regression method is used to estimate the econometric models. Findings The findings reveal that CEO overconfidence promotes corporate environmental disclosure and strong governance enhances both disclosure and the impact of overconfidence, underscoring its key oversight function. Research limitations/implications The study highlights the interplay between CEO overconfidence and governance quality in shaping corporate environmental disclosure, offering a foundation for future research into the behavioral factors influencing nonfinancial reporting. Practical implications The findings indicate that CEO overconfidence increases environmental disclosure under strong governance, highlighting the need for boards, investors and policymakers to integrate executive behavioral traits with governance mechanisms to enhance ESG transparency and sustainable decision-making. Social implications The findings have societal implications by supporting greater transparency and accountability in corporate environmental disclosure, which can enhance public trust, inform climate-related decision-making and contribute to broader sustainability goals. Originality/value This study addresses a clear gap in the literature by reconciling inconclusive findings on the relationship between CEO overconfidence and environmental disclosure. Prior research has largely overlooked the moderating role of corporate governance and has treated environmental disclosure in a fragmented manner (e.g. voluntary vs mandatory). This study offers an integrated perspective by jointly examining these relationships in an international context and by conceptualizing environmental disclosure as a unified construct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Governance
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-12-2024-0647
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does good governance moderate the relationship between CEO overconfidence and corporate environmental disclosure? International evidence

Anis Ben Amar, Inès Fakhfakh, Roua Ardhaoui
Corporate Governance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Does good governance moderate the relationship between CEO overconfidence and corporate environmental disclosure? International evidence

Anis Ben Amar, Inès Fakhfakh, Roua Ardhaoui
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aimed to shed light on the relationship between managerial overconfidence and corporate environmental disclosure and whether this relationship is moderated by good governance. Design/methodology/approach The sample includes 1395 international firms listed on the ESG index for the period 2010–2023. The feasible generalized least squares regression method is used to estimate the econometric models. Findings The findings reveal that CEO overconfidence promotes corporate environmental disclosure and strong governance enhances both disclosure and the impact of overconfidence, underscoring its key oversight function. Research limitations/implications The study highlights the interplay between CEO overconfidence and governance quality in shaping corporate environmental disclosure, offering a foundation for future research into the behavioral factors influencing nonfinancial reporting. Practical implications The findings indicate that CEO overconfidence increases environmental disclosure under strong governance, highlighting the need for boards, investors and policymakers to integrate executive behavioral traits with governance mechanisms to enhance ESG transparency and sustainable decision-making. Social implications The findings have societal implications by supporting greater transparency and accountability in corporate environmental disclosure, which can enhance public trust, inform climate-related decision-making and contribute to broader sustainability goals. Originality/value This study addresses a clear gap in the literature by reconciling inconclusive findings on the relationship between CEO overconfidence and environmental disclosure. Prior research has largely overlooked the moderating role of corporate governance and has treated environmental disclosure in a fragmented manner (e.g. voluntary vs mandatory). This study offers an integrated perspective by jointly examining these relationships in an international context and by conceptualizing environmental disclosure as a unified construct.

Corporate Governance
University of Sfax (TN), Higher Institute of Business Administration (SY), Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.