Nitrous Oxide Use in Autistic Children

OBJECTIVES: Describe the population of autistic children who undergo nitrous oxide sedation and the rate of associated adverse events (AEs). Analyze patient- and procedure-level factors associated with AEs in autistic children receiving nitrous oxide outside the dental setting. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study of autistic children, 3 to 18 years, who received nitrous oxide for procedural sedation during an emergency department or sedation encounter within a single hospital system between January 2014 and December 2023. Data extracted included patient demographics and comorbidities, as well as indication, maximum concentration, duration of administration, and AEs of nitrous oxide. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 186 patients [median age: 8 years (interquartile range: 5.2-12.75), 74.2% male]. Intravenous line placement was the most common indication in all locations. Most received 70% nitrous oxide with a median duration of 6 minutes (interquartile range: 4 -9.75). AEs were rare, occurring in only 3 patients (1.6%), with zero vomiting or aborted procedures. Given the rarity of AEs, no associated factors were able to be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Nitrous oxide is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated option for procedural sedation in autistic children, with a low rate of AEs. These findings add to the limited literature supporting its use in nondental settings and suggest it may be a valuable tool for facilitating minor procedures in this population. Future prospective studies are needed to optimize nitrous oxide delivery and determine factors contributing to AEs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Emergency Care
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000003726
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nitrous Oxide Use in Autistic Children

Nathan A. Call, Rebecca Kriss Burger, Naina Reddy
Pediatric Emergency Care
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Nitrous Oxide Use in Autistic Children

Nathan A. Call, Rebecca Kriss Burger, Naina Reddy
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Describe the population of autistic children who undergo nitrous oxide sedation and the rate of associated adverse events (AEs). Analyze patient- and procedure-level factors associated with AEs in autistic children receiving nitrous oxide outside the dental setting. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study of autistic children, 3 to 18 years, who received nitrous oxide for procedural sedation during an emergency department or sedation encounter within a single hospital system between January 2014 and December 2023. Data extracted included patient demographics and comorbidities, as well as indication, maximum concentration, duration of administration, and AEs of nitrous oxide. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 186 patients [median age: 8 years (interquartile range: 5.2-12.75), 74.2% male]. Intravenous line placement was the most common indication in all locations. Most received 70% nitrous oxide with a median duration of 6 minutes (interquartile range: 4 -9.75). AEs were rare, occurring in only 3 patients (1.6%), with zero vomiting or aborted procedures. Given the rarity of AEs, no associated factors were able to be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Nitrous oxide is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated option for procedural sedation in autistic children, with a low rate of AEs. These findings add to the limited literature supporting its use in nondental settings and suggest it may be a valuable tool for facilitating minor procedures in this population. Future prospective studies are needed to optimize nitrous oxide delivery and determine factors contributing to AEs.

Pediatric Emergency Care
Brown University (US), Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.