Transformative Reach under Asymmetric Citizenship: Civil-Society Leverage Points among Palestinian Citizens of Israel

Background Civil-society interventions among Palestinian citizens of Israel operate under asymmetric citizenship through different relational, interpretive-political, legal-institutional, and material-economic leverage points. Existing literatures address transfer, generalization, implementation, and institutionalization, but use different evidentiary rules for deciding when change moves beyond its immediate domain. Methods This comparative qualitative study examines four intervention models: Hand in Hand integrated bilingual education, the School for Peace critical-dialogue model, Adalah legal mobilization, and Eshet Chayil/Woman of Valor welfare-to-work programming. A systematized document search was combined with role-sensitive evidence appraisal, a common-minimum extraction layer, within-case pathway reconstruction, sequence analysis, and structured-focused comparison. The comparative synthesis uses 29 case-research records, 10 legal records, and three state or administrative records. Results The cases document different capacities and reach profiles. Hand in Hand documents substantial local relational and institutional reach without national educational transformation; the School for Peace documents political recognition with selected professional and civic pathways; Adalah documents direct institutional access with sequence-specific legal containment; and Eshet Chayil documents strong program-to-state institutionalization without corresponding structural economic security. Cross-level translation was accepted only when outcomes across analytical domains were connected through a traceable carrier or sequence. Conclusions The comparison supports a bounded proposition that leverage points are not self-translating. Institutionalization can stabilize or expand an intervention without being equivalent to structural transformation, and the mechanisms that constrain further reach are pathway-specific rather than reducible to generic context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.190115.1
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transformative Reach under Asymmetric Citizenship: Civil-Society Leverage Points among Palestinian Citizens of Israel

Istikomah Istikomah, Rian Solihin, Ifanul Abidin, Tirta Pandu Winata et al.
F1000Research
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

Transformative Reach under Asymmetric Citizenship: Civil-Society Leverage Points among Palestinian Citizens of Israel

Istikomah Istikomah, Rian Solihin, Ifanul Abidin, Tirta Pandu Winata, Moh Yazid S Hasi, Yonetje Taribaba, Sahrel Gunawan, Anugrah Dwi Laktomo, Hilarian Arischi Hadur, Matias Venansius Jogo, Hanna Sri Mulyo Dwi Kusuma
article en

Abstract

Background Civil-society interventions among Palestinian citizens of Israel operate under asymmetric citizenship through different relational, interpretive-political, legal-institutional, and material-economic leverage points. Existing literatures address transfer, generalization, implementation, and institutionalization, but use different evidentiary rules for deciding when change moves beyond its immediate domain. Methods This comparative qualitative study examines four intervention models: Hand in Hand integrated bilingual education, the School for Peace critical-dialogue model, Adalah legal mobilization, and Eshet Chayil/Woman of Valor welfare-to-work programming. A systematized document search was combined with role-sensitive evidence appraisal, a common-minimum extraction layer, within-case pathway reconstruction, sequence analysis, and structured-focused comparison. The comparative synthesis uses 29 case-research records, 10 legal records, and three state or administrative records. Results The cases document different capacities and reach profiles. Hand in Hand documents substantial local relational and institutional reach without national educational transformation; the School for Peace documents political recognition with selected professional and civic pathways; Adalah documents direct institutional access with sequence-specific legal containment; and Eshet Chayil documents strong program-to-state institutionalization without corresponding structural economic security. Cross-level translation was accepted only when outcomes across analytical domains were connected through a traceable carrier or sequence. Conclusions The comparison supports a bounded proposition that leverage points are not self-translating. Institutionalization can stabilize or expand an intervention without being equivalent to structural transformation, and the mechanisms that constrain further reach are pathway-specific rather than reducible to generic context.

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.