Circulating Microplastics in Routine Peripheral Blood: Bedside-Accessible Raman Screening in Myocardial Infarction and Controls

Circulating micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) have been linked to ischaemic heart disease, but the clinical evidence rests on bulk, mass-based assays applied to predefined polymer panels in blood obtained during invasive coronary procedures. Whether the same phenomenon can be captured from a routine bedside venipuncture, and what quality control that requires, has not been established. We applied a digestion-filtration protocol coupled to untargeted single-particle confocal Raman microspectroscopy to pre-procedural peripheral venous blood (8.0–10.0 mL per venipuncture) from eight healthy controls and six patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Particles were assigned against the Open Specy reference library at a Pearson correlation threshold of 0.80. After blank subtraction, nine particles were recovered from 147.0 mL of blood: polyethylene (n = 4), polystyrene (n = 3), ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA, n = 1) and polyurethane (PU, n = 1). Microplastics were detected in four of six AMI patients (66.7%) and two of eight controls (25.0%) (OR 6.00, p = 0.277), with particle densities of 0.093 and 0.043 particles/mL (p = 0.152). Control prevalence closely matched the 31.8% reported for coronary sampling in the reference clinical series, indicating that peripheral blood is not an empty compartment for this measurement. Sub-threshold assignments were characterised point by point across all thirteen samples with complete spectral output: of 126 points returning a polymer below 0.80, 28 also returned a graphite reference, and on every one of those 28, the graphite match ranked higher than the polymer, without exception. We characterise this as carbonaceous procedural background, and it forms the empirical basis of the assignment threshold. No contrast reached significance with the subject as the unit of analysis, and no inference about causality or clinical risk can be drawn from a cohort of this size. The contribution of this work is methodological: it shows that circulating microplastics can be recovered and chemically identified from routine peripheral venous blood drawn before any intervention, that untargeted assignment returns polymers absent from the panels used by current clinical assays, and that single-particle spectroscopy permits blank attribution and background characterisation that mass-based methods cannot provide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microplastics
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5040200
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circulating Microplastics in Routine Peripheral Blood: Bedside-Accessible Raman Screening in Myocardial Infarction and Controls

Marı́a Isabel Torres, Antonio Peñas, David Moreno‐González, Jorge Nicolás Dominguez et al.
Microplastics
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Circulating Microplastics in Routine Peripheral Blood: Bedside-Accessible Raman Screening in Myocardial Infarction and Controls

Marı́a Isabel Torres, Antonio Peñas, David Moreno‐González, Jorge Nicolás Dominguez, Belén Martínez Moral, Antonio José Sarabia Ruiz, Juan Carlos Fernández, R Rivera Fernández, Jorge Peláez Castillo, María de los Ángeles Martínez Arcos
article en

Abstract

Circulating micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) have been linked to ischaemic heart disease, but the clinical evidence rests on bulk, mass-based assays applied to predefined polymer panels in blood obtained during invasive coronary procedures. Whether the same phenomenon can be captured from a routine bedside venipuncture, and what quality control that requires, has not been established. We applied a digestion-filtration protocol coupled to untargeted single-particle confocal Raman microspectroscopy to pre-procedural peripheral venous blood (8.0–10.0 mL per venipuncture) from eight healthy controls and six patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Particles were assigned against the Open Specy reference library at a Pearson correlation threshold of 0.80. After blank subtraction, nine particles were recovered from 147.0 mL of blood: polyethylene (n = 4), polystyrene (n = 3), ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA, n = 1) and polyurethane (PU, n = 1). Microplastics were detected in four of six AMI patients (66.7%) and two of eight controls (25.0%) (OR 6.00, p = 0.277), with particle densities of 0.093 and 0.043 particles/mL (p = 0.152). Control prevalence closely matched the 31.8% reported for coronary sampling in the reference clinical series, indicating that peripheral blood is not an empty compartment for this measurement. Sub-threshold assignments were characterised point by point across all thirteen samples with complete spectral output: of 126 points returning a polymer below 0.80, 28 also returned a graphite reference, and on every one of those 28, the graphite match ranked higher than the polymer, without exception. We characterise this as carbonaceous procedural background, and it forms the empirical basis of the assignment threshold. No contrast reached significance with the subject as the unit of analysis, and no inference about causality or clinical risk can be drawn from a cohort of this size. The contribution of this work is methodological: it shows that circulating microplastics can be recovered and chemically identified from routine peripheral venous blood drawn before any intervention, that untargeted assignment returns polymers absent from the panels used by current clinical assays, and that single-particle spectroscopy permits blank attribution and background characterisation that mass-based methods cannot provide.

MicroplasticsVol. 5(4)
Universidad de Jaén (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.