From AUTO-ETHNO-GRAPHY to writing practice: developing and evaluating the Autoethnography Writing Framework (AWF)

Purpose This paper develops and evaluates the Autoethnography Writing Framework (AWF), a structured and dialogic approach designed to support the development of autoethnographic writing in collaborative academic contexts. Drawing on the established AUTO-ETHNO-GRAPHY formulation of autoethnographic craft, it addresses a methodological gap concerning how authors may be supported in producing reflexive, analytically robust and narratively coherent autoethnographic work. Design/methodology/approach An interpretive qualitative design was used to examine the application of the AWF within an edited collection of autoethnographic chapters of a book. Data were generated through questionnaires with two editors and eleven contributing authors. The dataset combined qualitative reflections with descriptive quantitative data and was analysed thematically to explore the framework's impact on writing practices, editorial feedback processes and authorial development. Findings The AWF enhanced clarity and supported structured engagement with autoethnographic writing, enabling deeper reflexivity, stronger integration of narrative and theory and increased confidence in writing. Feedback was experienced as dialogic, relational and developmental. However, participants and editors also identified tensions concerning the potential for structure to constrain interpretive openness if applied prescriptively. Originality/value The contribution of the paper lies not in proposing new dimensions of autoethnographic practice, but in operationalising established conceptual principles within a structured and dialogic developmental feedback framework. The AWF offers a practical resource for authors, supervisors, editors and reviewers seeking to support autoethnographic writing whilst remaining attentive to ongoing debates concerning structure, feedback and interpretive openness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research Journal
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-06-2026-0280
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From AUTO-ETHNO-GRAPHY to writing practice: developing and evaluating the Autoethnography Writing Framework (AWF)

Scott J. Threlfall
Qualitative Research Journal
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

From AUTO-ETHNO-GRAPHY to writing practice: developing and evaluating the Autoethnography Writing Framework (AWF)

Scott J. Threlfall
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper develops and evaluates the Autoethnography Writing Framework (AWF), a structured and dialogic approach designed to support the development of autoethnographic writing in collaborative academic contexts. Drawing on the established AUTO-ETHNO-GRAPHY formulation of autoethnographic craft, it addresses a methodological gap concerning how authors may be supported in producing reflexive, analytically robust and narratively coherent autoethnographic work. Design/methodology/approach An interpretive qualitative design was used to examine the application of the AWF within an edited collection of autoethnographic chapters of a book. Data were generated through questionnaires with two editors and eleven contributing authors. The dataset combined qualitative reflections with descriptive quantitative data and was analysed thematically to explore the framework's impact on writing practices, editorial feedback processes and authorial development. Findings The AWF enhanced clarity and supported structured engagement with autoethnographic writing, enabling deeper reflexivity, stronger integration of narrative and theory and increased confidence in writing. Feedback was experienced as dialogic, relational and developmental. However, participants and editors also identified tensions concerning the potential for structure to constrain interpretive openness if applied prescriptively. Originality/value The contribution of the paper lies not in proposing new dimensions of autoethnographic practice, but in operationalising established conceptual principles within a structured and dialogic developmental feedback framework. The AWF offers a practical resource for authors, supervisors, editors and reviewers seeking to support autoethnographic writing whilst remaining attentive to ongoing debates concerning structure, feedback and interpretive openness.

Qualitative Research Journal
Greater Manchester Police (GB), University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.