Are mental health services fit for purpose in modern multicultural Australia?

Australia is one of the most culturally and linguistically diverse nations globally, yet its mental health system has not kept pace with its demography, resulting in persistent gaps in integration, service planning and delivery, and equity outcomes. This perspective draws on The State of Multicultural Mental Health in Australia , a national report commissioned by Mental Health Australia’s Embrace Multicultural Mental Health project, and funded by the Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing. The research combined secondary analyses of the 2020–2022 National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing, a rapid review of Australian community-based interventions for culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and national stakeholder consultations with culturally and linguistically diverse communities and service providers. Interpretation of national epidemiological data is constrained by limitations, including the exclusion of people with limited English proficiency and the aggregation required for privacy, which obscures important heterogeneity. Within these constraints, apparent lower prevalence of anxiety and affective disorders among overseas-born Australians coexists with delayed and unequal access to care. These patterns may reflect structural barriers and gaps in system design rather than lower need. The rapid review and stakeholder consultations highlighted that culturally responsive, community-based and co-designed models represent good practice; however, they remain marginal and unevenly integrated into mainstream services. This article argues that multicultural mental health must be repositioned as core business across mental health systems and not as a specialist add-on. We make six recommendations for reform across service design, workforce, leadership, policy and data infrastructure, relevant to clinicians, service leaders and policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674261493336
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are mental health services fit for purpose in modern multicultural Australia?

Luis Salvador‐Carulla, Nasser Bagheri, Anthony Francis Jorm, Ilse Blignault et al.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Are mental health services fit for purpose in modern multicultural Australia?

Luis Salvador‐Carulla, Nasser Bagheri, Anthony Francis Jorm, Ilse Blignault, Shameran Slewa‐Younan, Bingqin Li, Ritesh Chimoriya, André M. N. Renzaho, Kingsley Agho
article en

Abstract

Australia is one of the most culturally and linguistically diverse nations globally, yet its mental health system has not kept pace with its demography, resulting in persistent gaps in integration, service planning and delivery, and equity outcomes. This perspective draws on The State of Multicultural Mental Health in Australia , a national report commissioned by Mental Health Australia’s Embrace Multicultural Mental Health project, and funded by the Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing. The research combined secondary analyses of the 2020–2022 National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing, a rapid review of Australian community-based interventions for culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and national stakeholder consultations with culturally and linguistically diverse communities and service providers. Interpretation of national epidemiological data is constrained by limitations, including the exclusion of people with limited English proficiency and the aggregation required for privacy, which obscures important heterogeneity. Within these constraints, apparent lower prevalence of anxiety and affective disorders among overseas-born Australians coexists with delayed and unequal access to care. These patterns may reflect structural barriers and gaps in system design rather than lower need. The rapid review and stakeholder consultations highlighted that culturally responsive, community-based and co-designed models represent good practice; however, they remain marginal and unevenly integrated into mainstream services. This article argues that multicultural mental health must be repositioned as core business across mental health systems and not as a specialist add-on. We make six recommendations for reform across service design, workforce, leadership, policy and data infrastructure, relevant to clinicians, service leaders and policymakers.

Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Translational Research Institute (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.