SBRF-Det: Scale-Boundary Representative Fusion for Multi-Finding Detection in Panoramic Dental Radiographs

Background: Panoramic dental radiographs frequently contain multiple coexisting pathological, anatomical, and treatment-related findings that vary in scale, contrast, and boundary definition. Although recent one-stage detectors provide strong performance, reliable localization of small or weakly defined findings remains challenging. Methods: We propose SBRF-Det, a one-stage multi-finding detector integrating scale-dependent representative allocation with boundary-conditioned local–global feature fusion at P4/16. The method was evaluated on OralXrays-9, comprising 12,688 panoramic radiographs and 84,099 retained annotations across nine categories, using a fixed 2688-image hold-out cohort. Twenty-two detector configurations were compared under a common protocol, and A0–A2 were further assessed using three independent seeds and paired radiograph-level bootstrap analysis. Results: SBRF-Det achieved 0.8777 precision, 0.8979 recall, 0.9152 mAP50, and 0.7029 mAP50-95. Relative to the matched YOLO12l baseline, mAP50-95 increased by 0.95 percentage points. Performance remained class dependent, with apical periodontitis reaching 0.4526 mAP50-95 versus 0.8401–0.8842 for implants, porcelain crowns, and ceramic bridges. SBRF-Det used 93.06 GFLOPs versus 95.99 for A0, but inference latency increased from 5.946 to 8.851 ms/image. Three-seed experiments preserved the A0–A1–A2 ordering, while paired bootstrap intervals for A2–A0 and A2–A1 excluded zero. Conclusions: SBRF-Det improves strict localization through representative and boundary-aware feature modeling, but the gain is modest and introduces a runtime trade-off. Patient-linked, multi-center, and reader-centered validation remains necessary before clinical deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16193259
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SBRF-Det: Scale-Boundary Representative Fusion for Multi-Finding Detection in Panoramic Dental Radiographs

Merve Temizer Ersoy, Faruk Özger, Mehmet Burukanlı, Shahid Mohammad Ganie et al.
Diagnostics
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

SBRF-Det: Scale-Boundary Representative Fusion for Multi-Finding Detection in Panoramic Dental Radiographs

Merve Temizer Ersoy, Faruk Özger, Mehmet Burukanlı, Shahid Mohammad Ganie, İshak Paçal, Furkan Karataş, Ömer Aslan
article en

Abstract

Background: Panoramic dental radiographs frequently contain multiple coexisting pathological, anatomical, and treatment-related findings that vary in scale, contrast, and boundary definition. Although recent one-stage detectors provide strong performance, reliable localization of small or weakly defined findings remains challenging. Methods: We propose SBRF-Det, a one-stage multi-finding detector integrating scale-dependent representative allocation with boundary-conditioned local–global feature fusion at P4/16. The method was evaluated on OralXrays-9, comprising 12,688 panoramic radiographs and 84,099 retained annotations across nine categories, using a fixed 2688-image hold-out cohort. Twenty-two detector configurations were compared under a common protocol, and A0–A2 were further assessed using three independent seeds and paired radiograph-level bootstrap analysis. Results: SBRF-Det achieved 0.8777 precision, 0.8979 recall, 0.9152 mAP50, and 0.7029 mAP50-95. Relative to the matched YOLO12l baseline, mAP50-95 increased by 0.95 percentage points. Performance remained class dependent, with apical periodontitis reaching 0.4526 mAP50-95 versus 0.8401–0.8842 for implants, porcelain crowns, and ceramic bridges. SBRF-Det used 93.06 GFLOPs versus 95.99 for A0, but inference latency increased from 5.946 to 8.851 ms/image. Three-seed experiments preserved the A0–A1–A2 ordering, while paired bootstrap intervals for A2–A0 and A2–A1 excluded zero. Conclusions: SBRF-Det improves strict localization through representative and boundary-aware feature modeling, but the gain is modest and introduces a runtime trade-off. Patient-linked, multi-center, and reader-centered validation remains necessary before clinical deployment.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(19)
Fenerbahçe University (TR), Iğdır Üniversitesi (TR), Bitlis Eren University (TR), Nakhchivan University (AZ), King Faisal University (SA), Atatürk University (TR), Istanbul University (TR), Nakhchivan State University (AZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.