Recent Developments in Studies on the Relation Between Endometriosis and Ovarian Cancer: Phenotype-Specific Risk, Molecular Convergence and Clinical Risk Stratification

Purpose: We aim to synthesize recent clinical and translational evidence on the relationship between endometriosis and ovarian cancer, with emphasis on publications from 2024 to 2026 and on clinically conservative risk stratification. Materials and methods: This state-of-the-art narrative review prioritizes major peer-reviewed publications from July 2024 to June 2026. Older landmark publications were used only where necessary to contextualize recent findings. Results: Recent evidence supports a selective, phenotype-dependent association instead of a generalized malignant potential of endometriosis. The strongest and most reproducible signal concerns epithelial ovarian cancer, especially clear-cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, with the highest relative risks reported for ovarian endometrioma and/or deep endometriosis. The ENDOCANCER meta-analysis found increased ovarian cancer risk across odds ratio, hazard ratio and standardized incidence ratio estimates but confirmed low absolute incidence and substantial heterogeneity. Contemporary reviews, including Leone Roberti Maggiore et al. and Bogani et al., emphasize low absolute lifetime risk and the absence of evidence supporting universal oncologic surveillance. Newer clinicopathological studies distinguish endometriosis-correlated tumors supported by transitional lesions indicative of malignant transformation from incidental coexistence. Molecular data support biological plausibility through ARID1A, PIK3CA, KRAS, PTEN, mismatch repair deficiency, POLE-mutated disease and p53-abnormal phenotypes, but these markers are not ready for routine prediction in endometriosis care. Conclusions: The immediate clinical implication is individualized risk assessment in place of routine cancer screening or prophylactic surgery based solely on the increased cancer risk associated with endometriosis. Counseling should integrate endometriosis phenotype, age, menopausal status, lesion dynamics, imaging atypia, hereditary cancer risk, reproductive goals and surgical consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18193241
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recent Developments in Studies on the Relation Between Endometriosis and Ovarian Cancer: Phenotype-Specific Risk, Molecular Convergence and Clinical Risk Stratification

Sławomir Ławicki, Aleksandra Urban, Klaudia Gutowska, Cezary Wojtyła et al.
Cancers
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Recent Developments in Studies on the Relation Between Endometriosis and Ovarian Cancer: Phenotype-Specific Risk, Molecular Convergence and Clinical Risk Stratification

Sławomir Ławicki, Aleksandra Urban, Klaudia Gutowska, Cezary Wojtyła, Piotr Laudański
article en

Abstract

Purpose: We aim to synthesize recent clinical and translational evidence on the relationship between endometriosis and ovarian cancer, with emphasis on publications from 2024 to 2026 and on clinically conservative risk stratification. Materials and methods: This state-of-the-art narrative review prioritizes major peer-reviewed publications from July 2024 to June 2026. Older landmark publications were used only where necessary to contextualize recent findings. Results: Recent evidence supports a selective, phenotype-dependent association instead of a generalized malignant potential of endometriosis. The strongest and most reproducible signal concerns epithelial ovarian cancer, especially clear-cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, with the highest relative risks reported for ovarian endometrioma and/or deep endometriosis. The ENDOCANCER meta-analysis found increased ovarian cancer risk across odds ratio, hazard ratio and standardized incidence ratio estimates but confirmed low absolute incidence and substantial heterogeneity. Contemporary reviews, including Leone Roberti Maggiore et al. and Bogani et al., emphasize low absolute lifetime risk and the absence of evidence supporting universal oncologic surveillance. Newer clinicopathological studies distinguish endometriosis-correlated tumors supported by transitional lesions indicative of malignant transformation from incidental coexistence. Molecular data support biological plausibility through ARID1A, PIK3CA, KRAS, PTEN, mismatch repair deficiency, POLE-mutated disease and p53-abnormal phenotypes, but these markers are not ready for routine prediction in endometriosis care. Conclusions: The immediate clinical implication is individualized risk assessment in place of routine cancer screening or prophylactic surgery based solely on the increased cancer risk associated with endometriosis. Counseling should integrate endometriosis phenotype, age, menopausal status, lesion dynamics, imaging atypia, hereditary cancer risk, reproductive goals and surgical consequences.

CancersVol. 18(19)
University of Białystok (PL), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Instytut Matki i Dziecka (PL), Uniwersytet Kaliski im. Prezydenta Stanisława Wojciechowskiego (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.