Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pleural Effusion and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Testing in Lung Cancer

Background: Pleural effusion (PE) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) are increasingly investigated as alternative sources of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for lung cancer molecular testing. As specimen-collection sites are close to thoracic tumors, specimens may contain clinically informative concentrations of tumor-derived DNA. However, standardized recommendations for PE/BALF-based ctDNA testing remain limited; practical, consensus-based recommendations for this testing in lung cancer were developed. Methods: The guidelines were developed using a structured multistep process modeled on the recent blood-based ctDNA guidelines. A targeted systematic literature review and evidence appraisal were performed, a national practice survey assessed current implementation barriers in Korea, and draft recommendations were refined through a two-round Delphi consensus involving eight multidisciplinary experts. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included in the qualitative review; 26 directly informed formal evidence grading, whereas one mixed-body-fluid implementation study was retained for contextual reference. The evidence was dominated by PE studies, with substantially fewer BALF-specific investigations. In a national survey of 109 analyzable respondents, 23 (21.1%) reported implementation of PE/BALF-based ctDNA testing. Lack of standardized protocols, reimbursement barriers, and technical complexity were common obstacles. Fifteen recommendations were finalized across three domains: pre-analytical procedures (R1-R4), analytical aspects and validation/quality management (R5-R8), and result interpretation, reporting, and clinical application (R9-R15). All recommendations met consensus-in criteria in round 1; agreement stability was confirmed in round 2. Conclusions: These consensus-based recommendations practically guide the implementation, validation, reporting, and interpretation of PE/BALF-based ctDNA testing in lung cancer, while highlighting the need for further matrix-specific evidence, particularly for BALF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2026.0303
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pleural Effusion and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Testing in Lung Cancer

Hoon Seok Kim, Myungshin Kim, Ju Sang Kim, Jaewoong Lee
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pleural Effusion and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Testing in Lung Cancer

Hoon Seok Kim, Myungshin Kim, Ju Sang Kim, Jaewoong Lee
article en

Abstract

Background: Pleural effusion (PE) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) are increasingly investigated as alternative sources of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for lung cancer molecular testing. As specimen-collection sites are close to thoracic tumors, specimens may contain clinically informative concentrations of tumor-derived DNA. However, standardized recommendations for PE/BALF-based ctDNA testing remain limited; practical, consensus-based recommendations for this testing in lung cancer were developed. Methods: The guidelines were developed using a structured multistep process modeled on the recent blood-based ctDNA guidelines. A targeted systematic literature review and evidence appraisal were performed, a national practice survey assessed current implementation barriers in Korea, and draft recommendations were refined through a two-round Delphi consensus involving eight multidisciplinary experts. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included in the qualitative review; 26 directly informed formal evidence grading, whereas one mixed-body-fluid implementation study was retained for contextual reference. The evidence was dominated by PE studies, with substantially fewer BALF-specific investigations. In a national survey of 109 analyzable respondents, 23 (21.1%) reported implementation of PE/BALF-based ctDNA testing. Lack of standardized protocols, reimbursement barriers, and technical complexity were common obstacles. Fifteen recommendations were finalized across three domains: pre-analytical procedures (R1-R4), analytical aspects and validation/quality management (R5-R8), and result interpretation, reporting, and clinical application (R9-R15). All recommendations met consensus-in criteria in round 1; agreement stability was confirmed in round 2. Conclusions: These consensus-based recommendations practically guide the implementation, validation, reporting, and interpretation of PE/BALF-based ctDNA testing in lung cancer, while highlighting the need for further matrix-specific evidence, particularly for BALF.

Annals of Laboratory Medicine
The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Incheon Catholic University (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.