Prognostic Impact of Telomere Maintenance Mechanisms in Neuroblastoma

Purpose Neuroblastoma, a common cancer in children, is characterized by striking clinical heterogeneity, ranging from spontaneous regression to fatal disease. Precise risk classification is therefore essential for appropriate treatment stratification. Given that genotoxic chemotherapy constitutes the mainstay of neuroblastoma treatment, it is particularly important to avoid overtreatment in patients with biologically favorable disease, notably in the heterogeneous group of current non–high-risk patients. Here, we tested the hypothesis that telomere maintenance mechanisms (TMM), which have been proposed as key hallmark of high-risk neuroblastoma, may improve neuroblastoma risk classification over current standard of care. Methods We examined the prognostic accuracy of TMM in comparison with current standard-of-care prognostic variables in 366 patients with neuroblastoma, including 259 non–high-risk patients (test set, n = 116; validation set, n = 143). Patient event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined according to TMM and currently used molecular classification by chromosomal copy-number alterations or gene expression profiles. The prognostic impact of the three molecular classifications was compared pairwise and with standard-of-care prognostic variables in multivariable analyses. Results TMM-based and gene expression-based classification accurately distinguished non–high-risk patients with excellent and adverse EFS and OS in both the test and validation sets. On multivariable analyses of standard-of-care prognostic factors, TMM-based classification remained the only risk factor in the final models (EFS, hazard ratio [HR], 6.4 [95% CI, 3.9 to 10.6], P < .001; OS, HR, 29.4 [95% CI, 9.6 to 90.0], P < .001), in contrast to the two other molecular classifiers. In pairwise comparisons, TMM-based classification outperformed the two other molecular classifications in models built on both EFS and OS ( P < .001 each). Conclusion TMM-based classification improves risk assessment in neuroblastoma, providing a rationale for clinical implementation as a new standard for risk stratification of patients with neuroblastoma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-26-00742
Primary Topic
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Impact of Telomere Maintenance Mechanisms in Neuroblastoma

Judith Gecht, Jessica Theißen, Wibke Schumacher, Roman Kurilov et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
article

Prognostic Impact of Telomere Maintenance Mechanisms in Neuroblastoma

Judith Gecht, Jessica Theißen, Wibke Schumacher, Roman Kurilov, Lisa Werr, Frank Berthold, Óscar González-Velasco, Benedikt Brors, Matthias Fischer, Christoph Bartenhagen, Sadaf Shabbir Mughal, Carolina Rosswog, Martin Peifer, Sandra Ackermann, Barbara Hero, Thorsten Simon, Nadine Hemstedt, Yvonne Kahlert, René Schmidt, Sophia Gunzer, Magdalena Sol Grauer, Andreas Kuckelkorn, Fynn Goossens
article en

Abstract

Purpose Neuroblastoma, a common cancer in children, is characterized by striking clinical heterogeneity, ranging from spontaneous regression to fatal disease. Precise risk classification is therefore essential for appropriate treatment stratification. Given that genotoxic chemotherapy constitutes the mainstay of neuroblastoma treatment, it is particularly important to avoid overtreatment in patients with biologically favorable disease, notably in the heterogeneous group of current non–high-risk patients. Here, we tested the hypothesis that telomere maintenance mechanisms (TMM), which have been proposed as key hallmark of high-risk neuroblastoma, may improve neuroblastoma risk classification over current standard of care. Methods We examined the prognostic accuracy of TMM in comparison with current standard-of-care prognostic variables in 366 patients with neuroblastoma, including 259 non–high-risk patients (test set, n = 116; validation set, n = 143). Patient event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined according to TMM and currently used molecular classification by chromosomal copy-number alterations or gene expression profiles. The prognostic impact of the three molecular classifications was compared pairwise and with standard-of-care prognostic variables in multivariable analyses. Results TMM-based and gene expression-based classification accurately distinguished non–high-risk patients with excellent and adverse EFS and OS in both the test and validation sets. On multivariable analyses of standard-of-care prognostic factors, TMM-based classification remained the only risk factor in the final models (EFS, hazard ratio [HR], 6.4 [95% CI, 3.9 to 10.6], P < .001; OS, HR, 29.4 [95% CI, 9.6 to 90.0], P < .001), in contrast to the two other molecular classifiers. In pairwise comparisons, TMM-based classification outperformed the two other molecular classifications in models built on both EFS and OS ( P < .001 each). Conclusion TMM-based classification improves risk assessment in neuroblastoma, providing a rationale for clinical implementation as a new standard for risk stratification of patients with neuroblastoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology
German Cancer Research Center (DE), University of Cologne (DE), University of Münster (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.