Strength and Stiffness of Double-Glass (3.2 mm) PV Panels Laminated with Soft Siloxane (PDMS) Gel for Zero Emission Room-Temperature Intact-Glass Recycling: Comparison with Double-Glass (1.6 mm) PV Panels Laminated with Solid EVA Polymer

The aim of this article is to assess whether a 3.2/3.2 mm fully tempered double-glass PV architecture laminated with soft PDMS provides sufficient glass-level stiffness while enabling room-temperature mechanical delamination with recovery of intact glass sheets. It is compared with a lightweight 1.6/1.6 mm semitempered glass architecture laminated with crosslinked EVA. Under identical loading, geometry, and support conditions, the estimated EVA-to-PDMS deflection ratio is approximately 2 at 25 °C and approximately 8 at 85 °C. The glass fracture resistance index is approximately sevenfold higher. These analytical estimates indicate the stiffness advantage of the 3.2/3.2 mm PDMS laminate; they are not complete-module measurements. The key contribution of this article is the optimization of the mechanical delamination of a PDMS-laminated double-glass PV panel at room temperature while keeping both glass sheets intact. Successive process optimization reduced the complete-cycle time within the observed range from 16 to 4 min. Four minutes was the shortest cycle achieved without visible glass fracture, and the maximum local front-propagation speed without visible fracture was approximately 40 mm/s. Optimization requires 2 min delamination without glass fracture. Published reports of glass/EVA/TPT PV panel delamination required thermal assistance and did not demonstrate equivalent room-temperature intact-glass delamination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su181910220
Primary Topic
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength and Stiffness of Double-Glass (3.2 mm) PV Panels Laminated with Soft Siloxane (PDMS) Gel for Zero Emission Room-Temperature Intact-Glass Recycling: Comparison with Double-Glass (1.6 mm) PV Panels Laminated with Solid EVA Polymer

Vladislav Poulek, Martin Kozelka
Sustainability
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
article

Strength and Stiffness of Double-Glass (3.2 mm) PV Panels Laminated with Soft Siloxane (PDMS) Gel for Zero Emission Room-Temperature Intact-Glass Recycling: Comparison with Double-Glass (1.6 mm) PV Panels Laminated with Solid EVA Polymer

Vladislav Poulek, Martin Kozelka
article en

Abstract

The aim of this article is to assess whether a 3.2/3.2 mm fully tempered double-glass PV architecture laminated with soft PDMS provides sufficient glass-level stiffness while enabling room-temperature mechanical delamination with recovery of intact glass sheets. It is compared with a lightweight 1.6/1.6 mm semitempered glass architecture laminated with crosslinked EVA. Under identical loading, geometry, and support conditions, the estimated EVA-to-PDMS deflection ratio is approximately 2 at 25 °C and approximately 8 at 85 °C. The glass fracture resistance index is approximately sevenfold higher. These analytical estimates indicate the stiffness advantage of the 3.2/3.2 mm PDMS laminate; they are not complete-module measurements. The key contribution of this article is the optimization of the mechanical delamination of a PDMS-laminated double-glass PV panel at room temperature while keeping both glass sheets intact. Successive process optimization reduced the complete-cycle time within the observed range from 16 to 4 min. Four minutes was the shortest cycle achieved without visible glass fracture, and the maximum local front-propagation speed without visible fracture was approximately 40 mm/s. Optimization requires 2 min delamination without glass fracture. Published reports of glass/EVA/TPT PV panel delamination required thermal assistance and did not demonstrate equivalent room-temperature intact-glass delamination.

SustainabilityVol. 18(19)
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.