Sociology and liberalism: A reconsideration

Sociology has often been defined in opposition or contrast to liberalism. However, a new postliberal historical revisionism may challenge this view. According to the postliberal position, liberalism should be understood as a broad political culture which contains both the “left” and “right” tendencies of contemporary politics. From this view, all modern politics, whether state-centered or market-oriented, forms a complementary whole dedicated to the liberation of the individual. This article uses this postliberal critique to reconsider the history of sociology. Revisiting sociological theories from the classical to the contemporary era, the article contends that the discipline’s seemingly contradictory impulses form a complementary, liberal project. This new perspective suggests that sociology is not so divided as is often supposed. However, if sociologists want to develop truly radical social theories, they must be attuned to liberalism as a historical force and the influence of liberalism on the history of sociological thought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Classical Sociology
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795x261492124
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociology and liberalism: A reconsideration

Clayton Fordahl
Journal of Classical Sociology
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
article

Sociology and liberalism: A reconsideration

Clayton Fordahl
article en

Abstract

Sociology has often been defined in opposition or contrast to liberalism. However, a new postliberal historical revisionism may challenge this view. According to the postliberal position, liberalism should be understood as a broad political culture which contains both the “left” and “right” tendencies of contemporary politics. From this view, all modern politics, whether state-centered or market-oriented, forms a complementary whole dedicated to the liberation of the individual. This article uses this postliberal critique to reconsider the history of sociology. Revisiting sociological theories from the classical to the contemporary era, the article contends that the discipline’s seemingly contradictory impulses form a complementary, liberal project. This new perspective suggests that sociology is not so divided as is often supposed. However, if sociologists want to develop truly radical social theories, they must be attuned to liberalism as a historical force and the influence of liberalism on the history of sociological thought.

Journal of Classical Sociology
University of Akureyri (IS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sociology and liberalism: A reconsideration — Clayton Fordahl · Journal of Classical Sociology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS