From Public to Private Governance, and Back—Eco‐Modulation as De‐Privatization in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

ABSTRACT The European Union is advancing circular economy policies, aimed at reducing the environmental impacts of products across their life‐cycles. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) exemplifies this strategy. It privatizes the end‐of‐life management of products to their producers, seeking thereby to incentivize the producer to design environmentally more sustainable products. However, EPR has failed to deliver significant improvements in product design. This article examines the EU's attempts to strengthen eco‐design in EPR through ‘eco‐modulation’. Applying the theory of competence‐and‐control, the article argues that the introduction of eco‐modulation will destabilize the public‐private balance in EPR, shifting EPR back from private towards public governance. This de‐privatization is expected to refine EPR's role within the EU's policy mix. Our findings thus offer insights for the development of EPR‐related circular economy policies, while also contributing to theories of privatization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70208
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Public to Private Governance, and Back—Eco‐Modulation as De‐Privatization in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

Harri Kalimo, Antti Jukka, Reid Lifset, Petrus Kautto
Regulation & Governance
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

From Public to Private Governance, and Back—Eco‐Modulation as De‐Privatization in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

Harri Kalimo, Antti Jukka, Reid Lifset, Petrus Kautto
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The European Union is advancing circular economy policies, aimed at reducing the environmental impacts of products across their life‐cycles. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) exemplifies this strategy. It privatizes the end‐of‐life management of products to their producers, seeking thereby to incentivize the producer to design environmentally more sustainable products. However, EPR has failed to deliver significant improvements in product design. This article examines the EU's attempts to strengthen eco‐design in EPR through ‘eco‐modulation’. Applying the theory of competence‐and‐control, the article argues that the introduction of eco‐modulation will destabilize the public‐private balance in EPR, shifting EPR back from private towards public governance. This de‐privatization is expected to refine EPR's role within the EU's policy mix. Our findings thus offer insights for the development of EPR‐related circular economy policies, while also contributing to theories of privatization.

Regulation & Governance
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), Yale University (US), Brussels School of Governance (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.