CRISPR dependency profiles distinguish pediatric from adult cancer cell lines via explainable machine learning: Identification of GPX4 and proliferative genes as therapeutic targets

Abstract Pediatric and adult cancers diverge profoundly in their molecular architecture, yet whether these differences extend to genome-scale genetic dependencies remains poorly characterized, with prior studies examining single subtypes or individual algorithms rather than a systematic, interpretable comparison. To address this gap, we tested whether Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 loss-of-function dependency profiles can discriminate pediatric from adult cancer cell lines, and applied explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to identify the genes driving this distinction. Chronos-normalized CRISPR GeneEffect scores for 18,531 genes across 1208 cell lines (242 pediatric, 966 adult) were analyzed; class imbalance was corrected with the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) within each training fold, differentially dependent genes were identified by Mann-Whitney U tests with Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction, and 200 features were retained by SelectKBest. Eleven classifiers were benchmarked under 5-fold cross-validation across 11 metrics, and predictions were interpreted with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) In this first (to our knowledge) genome-scale, multi-classifier comparison Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) achieved the best discrimination (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve [ROC-AUC] = 0.909, accuracy = 88.7%, Matthews Correlation Coefficient [MCC] = 0.632, Brier score = 0.089), with the leading ensemble and margin-based models reaching ROC-AUC values near 0.90. Among 3602 differentially dependent genes (FDR < 0.05), Integrin-Linked Kinase (ILK), Talin-1 (TLN1), and Aurora Kinase A (AURKA) showed greater dependency in pediatric lines, whereas Glutathione Peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and Insulin-like Growth Factor 2 messenger RNA-Binding Protein 1 (IGF2BP1) were comparatively more essential in adult lines. SHAP highlighted CHMP4B, IGF2BP1, GPX4, and LDB1, and the representative true-positive LIME case emphasized IGF2BP1, PAQR6, and CDS2. By exposing dependencies that adult-centric precision-oncology programs overlook, this work provides a framework for age-specific target discovery and prioritizes the pediatric-enriched ILK–TLN1 mechanotransduction axis for experimental validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligent Data Analysis
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088467x261490986
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CRISPR dependency profiles distinguish pediatric from adult cancer cell lines via explainable machine learning: Identification of GPX4 and proliferative genes as therapeutic targets

Cemil Çolak, Abdulvahap Pınar, Ahmet Kadir Arslan
Intelligent Data Analysis
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

CRISPR dependency profiles distinguish pediatric from adult cancer cell lines via explainable machine learning: Identification of GPX4 and proliferative genes as therapeutic targets

Cemil Çolak, Abdulvahap Pınar, Ahmet Kadir Arslan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pediatric and adult cancers diverge profoundly in their molecular architecture, yet whether these differences extend to genome-scale genetic dependencies remains poorly characterized, with prior studies examining single subtypes or individual algorithms rather than a systematic, interpretable comparison. To address this gap, we tested whether Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 loss-of-function dependency profiles can discriminate pediatric from adult cancer cell lines, and applied explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to identify the genes driving this distinction. Chronos-normalized CRISPR GeneEffect scores for 18,531 genes across 1208 cell lines (242 pediatric, 966 adult) were analyzed; class imbalance was corrected with the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) within each training fold, differentially dependent genes were identified by Mann-Whitney U tests with Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction, and 200 features were retained by SelectKBest. Eleven classifiers were benchmarked under 5-fold cross-validation across 11 metrics, and predictions were interpreted with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) In this first (to our knowledge) genome-scale, multi-classifier comparison Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) achieved the best discrimination (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve [ROC-AUC] = 0.909, accuracy = 88.7%, Matthews Correlation Coefficient [MCC] = 0.632, Brier score = 0.089), with the leading ensemble and margin-based models reaching ROC-AUC values near 0.90. Among 3602 differentially dependent genes (FDR < 0.05), Integrin-Linked Kinase (ILK), Talin-1 (TLN1), and Aurora Kinase A (AURKA) showed greater dependency in pediatric lines, whereas Glutathione Peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and Insulin-like Growth Factor 2 messenger RNA-Binding Protein 1 (IGF2BP1) were comparatively more essential in adult lines. SHAP highlighted CHMP4B, IGF2BP1, GPX4, and LDB1, and the representative true-positive LIME case emphasized IGF2BP1, PAQR6, and CDS2. By exposing dependencies that adult-centric precision-oncology programs overlook, this work provides a framework for age-specific target discovery and prioritizes the pediatric-enriched ILK–TLN1 mechanotransduction axis for experimental validation.

Intelligent Data Analysis
Adıyaman University (TR), Inonu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.