Coherence as a Relational Property: Toward a Foundational Science of Coherence

Coherence is the degree to which the relationships within a system mutually hold one another in place. This position paper advances that sentence as a positive working definition and develops it into a testable construct, while leaving the ontology of coherence open. The construct has three components: integration (I), whether the parts form one relational structure; mutual constraint (K_m), whether the relationships limit and depend on one another; and recoverability (R_e), defined as a structural capacity measured without reference to whether recovery occurs. Systems are compared by dominance (Pareto) order rather than a single weighted score. A worked example shows that two signed relational structures with identical pairwise statistics can differ in how far they are from holding together, so pairwise-additive scores are blind to mutual-constraint defects that a higher-order probe (the frustration index) detects. A synthetic experiment across 180 random signed graphs shows this is the typical case: at fixed pairwise statistics, the frustration index varied in 93 percent of conditions. A synthetic boundary test shows that the choice of measurement boundary can dominate the measured value, and that a connectivity-based rule for deriving the boundary fails when a system's parts are tightly coupled. The paper nominates four candidate mathematical invariants, each with its evidence status and a distinguishing test; positions the Standard Coherence Fidelity Layer (SCFL) as the measurement architecture for the construct rather than its definition; compares the construct level by level with constraint-satisfaction, structural-balance, sheaf-theoretic, integrated-information and constraint-centered accounts; and closes with a research program and ten falsification conditions. Files: manuscript (PDF) and supplementary code (three Python scripts with README) that reproduce every reported statistic. All experiments are synthetic; no empirical data or SCFL operators are used.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23247213
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Dynamics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Coherence as a Relational Property: Toward a Foundational Science of Coherence

Ronald Brogdon, Juanita Rubio
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complex Systems and Dynamics
preprint

Coherence as a Relational Property: Toward a Foundational Science of Coherence

Ronald Brogdon, Juanita Rubio
preprint en

Abstract

Coherence is the degree to which the relationships within a system mutually hold one another in place. This position paper advances that sentence as a positive working definition and develops it into a testable construct, while leaving the ontology of coherence open. The construct has three components: integration (I), whether the parts form one relational structure; mutual constraint (K_m), whether the relationships limit and depend on one another; and recoverability (R_e), defined as a structural capacity measured without reference to whether recovery occurs. Systems are compared by dominance (Pareto) order rather than a single weighted score. A worked example shows that two signed relational structures with identical pairwise statistics can differ in how far they are from holding together, so pairwise-additive scores are blind to mutual-constraint defects that a higher-order probe (the frustration index) detects. A synthetic experiment across 180 random signed graphs shows this is the typical case: at fixed pairwise statistics, the frustration index varied in 93 percent of conditions. A synthetic boundary test shows that the choice of measurement boundary can dominate the measured value, and that a connectivity-based rule for deriving the boundary fails when a system's parts are tightly coupled. The paper nominates four candidate mathematical invariants, each with its evidence status and a distinguishing test; positions the Standard Coherence Fidelity Layer (SCFL) as the measurement architecture for the construct rather than its definition; compares the construct level by level with constraint-satisfaction, structural-balance, sheaf-theoretic, integrated-information and constraint-centered accounts; and closes with a research program and ten falsification conditions. Files: manuscript (PDF) and supplementary code (three Python scripts with README) that reproduce every reported statistic. All experiments are synthetic; no empirical data or SCFL operators are used.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complex Systems and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.