Measuring the Posterior Airway Space: Inaccuracies in Taking and Interpreting Lateral Cephalograms

Abstract Objectives Although lateral cephalograms (LCs) are often used to measure the posterior airway space (PAS), little consensus has been reached on standardised PAS measurement procedures, which hinders reproducibility. This study uses LCs to evaluate the reliability of PAS measurements and explore potential inaccuracies. Methods Two examiners measured the PAS dimensions of different LCs from the same patient, addressing deviations between examiners and variations among LCs. This study included a retrospective analysis of LCs from 45 patients, considering intrarater and interrater reliability, as well as the impact of cervical spine inclination on PAS measurements. Results The results revealed a correlation between the degree of cervical spine inclination and the PAS score. Despite a highly reliable measurement protocol, significant variabilities were observed in measurements from different LCs of the same patient. Conclusion This study highlights the need for consistent patient positioning and suggests further investigations into factors such as swallowing and breathing to increase the reproducibility of PAS measurements using LCs. These findings have implications for refining radiographic protocols and improving the reliability with which the PAS can be assessed, with the potential to serve as a screening tool that identifies patients who should undergo further diagnostic measurements, such as polysomnography. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials register (No. 348 DRKS00029159).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-026-03240-0
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the Posterior Airway Space: Inaccuracies in Taking and Interpreting Lateral Cephalograms

Wiebke Semper-Hogg, Marc Anton Fuessinger, Leonard Simon Brandenburg, Stefan Schlager et al.
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Measuring the Posterior Airway Space: Inaccuracies in Taking and Interpreting Lateral Cephalograms

Wiebke Semper-Hogg, Marc Anton Fuessinger, Leonard Simon Brandenburg, Stefan Schlager, Julia Vera Weingart, Katharina Theresa Obermeier, Johanna Radeke, Britta Jung, Steffen Schwarz, Patrick von Schierholz, Anne Wertheimer, Marc Christian Metzger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Although lateral cephalograms (LCs) are often used to measure the posterior airway space (PAS), little consensus has been reached on standardised PAS measurement procedures, which hinders reproducibility. This study uses LCs to evaluate the reliability of PAS measurements and explore potential inaccuracies. Methods Two examiners measured the PAS dimensions of different LCs from the same patient, addressing deviations between examiners and variations among LCs. This study included a retrospective analysis of LCs from 45 patients, considering intrarater and interrater reliability, as well as the impact of cervical spine inclination on PAS measurements. Results The results revealed a correlation between the degree of cervical spine inclination and the PAS score. Despite a highly reliable measurement protocol, significant variabilities were observed in measurements from different LCs of the same patient. Conclusion This study highlights the need for consistent patient positioning and suggests further investigations into factors such as swallowing and breathing to increase the reproducibility of PAS measurements using LCs. These findings have implications for refining radiographic protocols and improving the reliability with which the PAS can be assessed, with the potential to serve as a screening tool that identifies patients who should undergo further diagnostic measurements, such as polysomnography. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials register (No. 348 DRKS00029159).

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.