Bias Assessment and Correction of Atmospheric Temperature and Vapor Density Profiles from Six Ground-Based Microwave Radiometers over Wuhan

Ground-based microwave radiometers (MWRs) continuously retrieve atmospheric temperature and vapor density profiles, but systematic biases relative to radiosonde observations limit their quantitative application in nowcasting and data assimilation. In this study, we matched temperature and vapor density profiles from six ground-based MWRs with L-band radiosonde observations at Wuhan to evaluate data quality for 2025 and analyze the sources of station-to-station bias differences. We established linear regression, random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) models to correct biases by height group and sky condition, respectively, and compared the corrected data with the original data. The results show that, compared with radiosonde data, the MWR temperature was generally cold-biased under clear (−0.895 °C), cloudy (−0.729 °C), and rainy (−0.188 °C) skies, whereas the vapor density was moist-biased under all three conditions (+0.417, +0.209, and +0.47 g/m3). The per-station biases differed markedly and could not be explained by spatial separation alone, indicating station-specific environmental and representativeness differences rather than instrument differences. All three correction methods significantly reduced the deviations; taking the RMSE together with the residual bias as the joint criterion, the ANN was selected as the best method, reducing the test set temperature RMSE from 2.802 °C to 2.284 °C (−18.5%) and the vapor density RMSE from 2.764 g/m3 to 1.746 g/m3 (−36.8%), followed by random forest (−17% and −35.9%) and linear regression (−6.8% and −6.8%). After removing the small constant residual bias, the ANN is both the most accurate and effectively unbiased. The corrected profiles brought the thermodynamic instability parameters to a usable level for severe-convection nowcasting and provided an early-warning signal in the pre-onset period of gale and short-duration heavy rain, which also provide a reference for the quantitative application of microwave radiometer data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18193445
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias Assessment and Correction of Atmospheric Temperature and Vapor Density Profiles from Six Ground-Based Microwave Radiometers over Wuhan

Kangyi Zhu, Guirong Xu, Aning Gou, Weifa Yang
Remote Sensing
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
article

Bias Assessment and Correction of Atmospheric Temperature and Vapor Density Profiles from Six Ground-Based Microwave Radiometers over Wuhan

Kangyi Zhu, Guirong Xu, Aning Gou, Weifa Yang
article en

Abstract

Ground-based microwave radiometers (MWRs) continuously retrieve atmospheric temperature and vapor density profiles, but systematic biases relative to radiosonde observations limit their quantitative application in nowcasting and data assimilation. In this study, we matched temperature and vapor density profiles from six ground-based MWRs with L-band radiosonde observations at Wuhan to evaluate data quality for 2025 and analyze the sources of station-to-station bias differences. We established linear regression, random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) models to correct biases by height group and sky condition, respectively, and compared the corrected data with the original data. The results show that, compared with radiosonde data, the MWR temperature was generally cold-biased under clear (−0.895 °C), cloudy (−0.729 °C), and rainy (−0.188 °C) skies, whereas the vapor density was moist-biased under all three conditions (+0.417, +0.209, and +0.47 g/m3). The per-station biases differed markedly and could not be explained by spatial separation alone, indicating station-specific environmental and representativeness differences rather than instrument differences. All three correction methods significantly reduced the deviations; taking the RMSE together with the residual bias as the joint criterion, the ANN was selected as the best method, reducing the test set temperature RMSE from 2.802 °C to 2.284 °C (−18.5%) and the vapor density RMSE from 2.764 g/m3 to 1.746 g/m3 (−36.8%), followed by random forest (−17% and −35.9%) and linear regression (−6.8% and −6.8%). After removing the small constant residual bias, the ANN is both the most accurate and effectively unbiased. The corrected profiles brought the thermodynamic instability parameters to a usable level for severe-convection nowcasting and provided an early-warning signal in the pre-onset period of gale and short-duration heavy rain, which also provide a reference for the quantitative application of microwave radiometer data.

Remote SensingVol. 18(19)
China Meteorological Administration (CN), Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (CN), Ningxia Meteorological Bureau (CN), Institute of Heavy Rain, China Meteorological Administration (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.