People are good at stewardship

Abstract Environmental sciences and policy have long been framed on the premise that environmental harm is an expression of human nature rather than a product of specific historical and political arrangements. This framing has shaped a generation of interventions designed to constrain human behaviour rather than enable human capacity. We argue for a different starting point that the capacity to live in generative, reciprocal relationships with the rest of nature is one of our defining strengths as a species and that the evidence for this claim is now extensive, cross‐disciplinary and consequential. We recommend reorienting both research and practice around the acknowledgement that environmental degradation is not a human baseline to be incrementally mitigated, but a historically recent pathology rooted in settler and extractive colonialism, industrial capitalism and the deliberate dismantling of Indigenous and other local governance systems. Recentring the human capacity for stewardship shifts the primary focus of the pro‐environmental enterprise from mitigating a flaw to enabling a human strength. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70454
Primary Topic
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

People are good at stewardship

Philip A. Loring, Miguel Sioui
People and Nature
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
article

People are good at stewardship

Philip A. Loring, Miguel Sioui
article en

Abstract

Abstract Environmental sciences and policy have long been framed on the premise that environmental harm is an expression of human nature rather than a product of specific historical and political arrangements. This framing has shaped a generation of interventions designed to constrain human behaviour rather than enable human capacity. We argue for a different starting point that the capacity to live in generative, reciprocal relationships with the rest of nature is one of our defining strengths as a species and that the evidence for this claim is now extensive, cross‐disciplinary and consequential. We recommend reorienting both research and practice around the acknowledgement that environmental degradation is not a human baseline to be incrementally mitigated, but a historically recent pathology rooted in settler and extractive colonialism, industrial capitalism and the deliberate dismantling of Indigenous and other local governance systems. Recentring the human capacity for stewardship shifts the primary focus of the pro‐environmental enterprise from mitigating a flaw to enabling a human strength. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and Nature
The Nature Conservancy (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

People are good at stewardship — Philip A. Loring, Miguel Sioui · People and Nature (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS