Artian's Chiral-Current Pattern Audit: Mirror Reversal and Conditional Evidence in Molecular Networks

A raw-data test of mirror-related magnetic-current structure in two-dimensional molecular networks Artian's Chiral-Current Pattern Audit: Mirror Reversal and Conditional Evidence in Molecular Networks Version 1.0 | Ali Attar Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23236716 Website: quantumtraction.org This paper tests a necessary mirror-response consequence of Quantum Traction Theory against the public KU Leuven DNTT molecular-network current archive. The inherited source relation and the measured four-current coordinate are \[ \boxed{ \begin{aligned} p_c(V)&=\chi_c\lambda_c f(V),\quad \lambda_c>0 \ \Longrightarrow\ \widehat p_R=-\widehat p_S,\\ \Xi_{\chi M}[J](V)&=\frac14\log\frac{J_{S,+}(V)J_{R,-}(V)}{J_{S,-}(V)J_{R,+}(V)}. \end{aligned}} \] The first line follows when the event has one chirality-odd source direction and a qualified common access kernel, with positive voltage-independent relative amplitudes. The second is an exact algebraic interaction coordinate for positive mean-current magnitudes. It cancels separable molecular and magnetic gains. A recorded current interaction and a material-certified common kernel are different results. What passes in the data Independent parsing retains 7,219 of 7,223 spectroscopy text entries; four have empty numerical payloads. The molecular subset contains 2,603 usable sweeps in 23 nominal areas. At all six declared biases, S-DNTT has positive central magnetic-current asymmetry and R-DNTT has negative central asymmetry. The average interaction remains positive under alternative aggregation rules and all 23 one-area deletions. \[ \overline{\Xi}=0.3650022144, \qquad \operatorname{SE}_{\rm area}=0.0475168180. \] A linearized Welch-Satterthwaite calculation gives \(t=7.6815374\), effective degrees of freedom \(\nu=13.3575557\), two-sided \(p=2.9391261\times10^{-6}\), and a normal-equivalent sensitivity of approximately 4.7 sigma under the declared independent-area error model. The t statistic is not reported as 7.68 sigma. Whole-area bootstrap intervals and alternate weighting checks are included. Shape, controls and identification The normalized raw mirror profiles have cosine 0.9872646 and a learned relative amplitude of 0.4687556. Their relative residual is 0.1590869. These are descriptive shape diagnostics, not a second detection significance or a completed material prediction. The independently recorded solvent control lacks the downward-magnetization endpoints at plus and minus 1.5 V, so the full six-setting control-corrected test is ineligible. A four-point coverage-limited diagnostic is reported separately. Each molecular/magnetization cell has a different recorded acquisition date. The exact design-rank calculation shows that unrestricted date-dependent current response can absorb the interaction. The approximately 4.7-sigma sensitivity therefore excludes unmeasured between-day systematic uncertainty. Nominal areas are not automatically independent preparations. Scientific scope The recorded central reversal passes the QTT necessary-pattern consistency check, and the mean contrast rejects its zero null within the printed area model. This is not a QTT-exclusive discovery or a rejection of quantum mechanics. The original experimental authors already reported an enantiospecific magnetic response. This paper adds a reproducible raw-data audit, the source/access interpretation, gain-canceling algebra, conditional covariance analysis, and an exact account of what the acquisition design can identify. The archive was first inspected on 28 September 2026, before the extended uncertainty analysis recorded on 8 October. It was selected from a wider retrospective search. There is no blind preregistration, disjoint validation split, or family-wide search significance. The DNTT-specific event graph, numerical source-to-current matrix, and independent common-kernel certificate remain material-application requirements, not quantities inferred from a favorable curve. Contents Onboarding, QTT axiom and book-anchor cards, and the distinction between source structure and measured current. A self-contained common-kernel theorem, its precise premises, and a counterexample showing why a one-dimensional source alone is insufficient. Four-current gain cancellation, inverse-hyperbolic-tangent readout identity, and the inherited Log-Gram matrix relation. All six molecular values, area covariance, bootstrap checks, alternate aggregation, deletion stability, and all available controls. Date-confounding theorem, explicit gain counterexample, matched construction accounting, scoped falsifiers, and a crossed-acquisition design for the next test. Data and scientific dependencies Experimental data: KU Leuven DNTT archive, version 1.0. Experimental article: Rana et al., Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity in Two-Dimensional Self-Assembled Molecular Networks. Mathematical dependency: Finite Source-Graph Uniqueness and Normalized Energy-Shape Theorems for Chiral Spin Filtering. Book: Quantum Traction Theory, version 10.01, p. 48, pp. 80-82, p. 92, pp. 263-266 and pp. 912-916. Reader references: Access Law, address w, and Artian's Universe and the source/readout distinction. Same-author works supply mathematical dependencies and terminology, not independent experimental evidence. The positive-operator and log-ratio identities use standard mathematics. Any numerical comparator must disclose its material inputs, fitted functions, nuisance parameters and acquisition assumptions on the same terms as QTT. Files and reproducibility The main PDF is the default document preview. The reconstruction ZIP contains the standalone LaTeX source, portable analysis and verification programs, trace and area tables, full numerical results, figures, data provenance, dependencies and SHA-256 manifest. The original 181 MB archive remains at its institutional DOI. The reconstruction has 324 passing arithmetic and algebra checks; these are verification checks, not additional observations. AI systems assisted with preparation and calculation checks. The author takes responsibility for the paper and its claims; the book's account of AI assistance is on page 92.