A comparative analysis of an average versus daily 60 min of physical activity on cardiometabolic health in children and adolescents: a NHANES study

Abstract Objective To examine differences in sedentary time, anthropometric and cardiometabolic variables between children and adolescents who meet moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) guidelines by averaging 60 min/day ( average group) versus engaging in at least 60 min daily ( daily group). Methods Data from 724 children and adolescents ( average group = 371, daily group = 353) aged 6–17 years, with at least six valid days of accelerometer data from the 2003–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, were analyzed. Design-based (survey-weighted) regression was used to compare the two groups, unadjusted and adjusted for sex and age. Results Youth in the daily group showed higher MVPA levels (125 ± 2.5 vs. 84 ± 1.8 min/day, p < 0.01) and lower sedentary time (322 ± 4.6 vs. 368 ± 5.3 min/day, p < 0.01), BMI (17.0 ± 0.2 vs. 18.5 ± 0.3 kg/m 2 , p < 0.01) and waist circumference (59.9 ± 0.6 vs. 66.1 ± 0.9 cm, p < 0.01) compared to the average group. However, no significant differences were found between groups for cardiometabolic variables. After adjusting for sex and age, the differences in BMI ( p = 0.37) and waist circumference ( p = 0.11) were no longer significant. Conclusions Although the daily group engaged in ~50% more MVPA, no significant differences in cardiometabolic outcomes were observed. Thus, adopting the term “on average” in the guidelines may reduce barriers and help more youth meet physical activity recommendations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sport Sciences for Health
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-026-01971-8
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of an average versus daily 60 min of physical activity on cardiometabolic health in children and adolescents: a NHANES study

Eduardo Caldas Costa, Felipe Vogt Cureau, Tiago V. Barreira, Gianpietro Elías
Sport Sciences for Health
Physical Activity and Health
article

A comparative analysis of an average versus daily 60 min of physical activity on cardiometabolic health in children and adolescents: a NHANES study

Eduardo Caldas Costa, Felipe Vogt Cureau, Tiago V. Barreira, Gianpietro Elías
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To examine differences in sedentary time, anthropometric and cardiometabolic variables between children and adolescents who meet moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) guidelines by averaging 60 min/day ( average group) versus engaging in at least 60 min daily ( daily group). Methods Data from 724 children and adolescents ( average group = 371, daily group = 353) aged 6–17 years, with at least six valid days of accelerometer data from the 2003–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, were analyzed. Design-based (survey-weighted) regression was used to compare the two groups, unadjusted and adjusted for sex and age. Results Youth in the daily group showed higher MVPA levels (125 ± 2.5 vs. 84 ± 1.8 min/day, p < 0.01) and lower sedentary time (322 ± 4.6 vs. 368 ± 5.3 min/day, p < 0.01), BMI (17.0 ± 0.2 vs. 18.5 ± 0.3 kg/m 2 , p < 0.01) and waist circumference (59.9 ± 0.6 vs. 66.1 ± 0.9 cm, p < 0.01) compared to the average group. However, no significant differences were found between groups for cardiometabolic variables. After adjusting for sex and age, the differences in BMI ( p = 0.37) and waist circumference ( p = 0.11) were no longer significant. Conclusions Although the daily group engaged in ~50% more MVPA, no significant differences in cardiometabolic outcomes were observed. Thus, adopting the term “on average” in the guidelines may reduce barriers and help more youth meet physical activity recommendations.

Sport Sciences for HealthVol. 22(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.