Why specialize? An exploration of how clinical experience influences students’ motivation for specialist nursing education

Abstract Background Existing research has examined motivation among specialist nursing students and identified factors influencing their pursuit of postgraduate education, including the role of clinical experience. However, it remains unclear whether and how motivation varies with years of clinical experience, and how such differences can be understood from a pedagogical perspective in postgraduate nursing education. Aim To explore how nurses with different lengths of clinical experience articulate their motivations for pursuing specialist nursing education. Methods This study was part of a larger survey examining the effects of clinical experience on self-efficacy, nursing competence, academic performance, and study outcomes among specialist nursing students. This paper presents a qualitative analysis of students’ reported motivation to pursue further education, based on qualitative free-text responses. The study used inductive descriptive thematic analysis, supplemented by cross-group comparisons and descriptive quantification of codes to identify patterns across clinical experience length. When interpreting the analysis, the study used Situated Learning theory and the Novice to Expert framework. Results A total of 94 students participated. The analysis identified four overarching motivational themes: Professional Role Advancement, Expanded Participation, Contributing to the Improvement of Clinical Practice, and Personal Advantages. Overall, participants described a broad range of motivations for undertaking specialist nursing education, with emphasis across themes varying by group according to length of clinical experience. Conclusion The findings suggest that length of prior clinical experience may shape not only what students know but also what they seek from formal education and how they engage with new knowledge. Consistent with perspectives on situated learning and the development of nursing expertise, the findings suggest that students’ prior experiences and positions in clinical practice may influence how they approach and make sense of further education. For educators, this underscores the importance of not assuming that all students have the same personal goals. Rather, education may serve different purposes for different students, and recognizing these varied orientations may help shape educational environments that respond to students’ different starting points and expectations while maintaining shared academic and professional goals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-05482-2
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why specialize? An exploration of how clinical experience influences students’ motivation for specialist nursing education

Lena Skoglund, Helena Kullenberg, Maria Christidis
BMC Nursing
Nursing education and management
article

Why specialize? An exploration of how clinical experience influences students’ motivation for specialist nursing education

Lena Skoglund, Helena Kullenberg, Maria Christidis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Existing research has examined motivation among specialist nursing students and identified factors influencing their pursuit of postgraduate education, including the role of clinical experience. However, it remains unclear whether and how motivation varies with years of clinical experience, and how such differences can be understood from a pedagogical perspective in postgraduate nursing education. Aim To explore how nurses with different lengths of clinical experience articulate their motivations for pursuing specialist nursing education. Methods This study was part of a larger survey examining the effects of clinical experience on self-efficacy, nursing competence, academic performance, and study outcomes among specialist nursing students. This paper presents a qualitative analysis of students’ reported motivation to pursue further education, based on qualitative free-text responses. The study used inductive descriptive thematic analysis, supplemented by cross-group comparisons and descriptive quantification of codes to identify patterns across clinical experience length. When interpreting the analysis, the study used Situated Learning theory and the Novice to Expert framework. Results A total of 94 students participated. The analysis identified four overarching motivational themes: Professional Role Advancement, Expanded Participation, Contributing to the Improvement of Clinical Practice, and Personal Advantages. Overall, participants described a broad range of motivations for undertaking specialist nursing education, with emphasis across themes varying by group according to length of clinical experience. Conclusion The findings suggest that length of prior clinical experience may shape not only what students know but also what they seek from formal education and how they engage with new knowledge. Consistent with perspectives on situated learning and the development of nursing expertise, the findings suggest that students’ prior experiences and positions in clinical practice may influence how they approach and make sense of further education. For educators, this underscores the importance of not assuming that all students have the same personal goals. Rather, education may serve different purposes for different students, and recognizing these varied orientations may help shape educational environments that respond to students’ different starting points and expectations while maintaining shared academic and professional goals.

BMC NursingVol. 25(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.