Beyond Technical Performance: A Hybrid Efficiency Model 2 for HPHT Drilling Fluids

Drilling-fluid selection in high-pressure/high-temperature (HPHT) wells is usually assessed through technical performance and chemical cost, while time overruns and the consequences of fluid losses are treated separately. This study develops a hybrid efficiency framework that combines a Technical Performance Index (TPI), built from mud-weight, loss, time, and hole-stability compliance and weighted with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), with a Total Real Cost (TRC) that adds an unplanned-time cost proxy and a loss-based environmental cost proxy to chemical cost. The Hybrid Efficiency Index (HEI) is the ratio of the two. The framework was applied to the comparable 12¼-in. sections of two anonymized land wells in Northern Kuwait (K-300) and the Eastern Venezuela Basin (V-100), measuring performance against design targets rather than raw operational values. An initial compilation of the inputs favored K-300 by an HEI ratio of 1.65. An audit of every input against the source documents found that the design programs belonged to analogous wells, that the V-100 loss figure combined all loss categories (3,146 bbl, of which 1,153 bbl went to the formation), and that the stability events used did not match the records of the interval. With audited inputs, the TRC was USD 359,485 for K-300 and USD 260,356 for V-100, and the HEI ratio was 0.77, favoring V-100. This result was insensitive to criterion weights, the stability penalty, the mud-weight metric, and the environmental proxy, but reversed (1.23) when the analogous plan was applied without scaling by drilled length; the full audited range was 0.53–1.41. The comparison between the two wells has no competitive intent: it is not a ranking or a competition between countries, regions, operators, or contractors, but a controlled methodological illustration showing that loss accounting and the time reference can outweigh the fluid data themselves, and that traceable data provenance makes such errors detectable. The results are illustrative and do not establish causality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23224919
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Technical Performance: A Hybrid Efficiency Model 2 for HPHT Drilling Fluids

Jose A Golindano
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Beyond Technical Performance: A Hybrid Efficiency Model 2 for HPHT Drilling Fluids

Jose A Golindano
article en

Abstract

Drilling-fluid selection in high-pressure/high-temperature (HPHT) wells is usually assessed through technical performance and chemical cost, while time overruns and the consequences of fluid losses are treated separately. This study develops a hybrid efficiency framework that combines a Technical Performance Index (TPI), built from mud-weight, loss, time, and hole-stability compliance and weighted with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), with a Total Real Cost (TRC) that adds an unplanned-time cost proxy and a loss-based environmental cost proxy to chemical cost. The Hybrid Efficiency Index (HEI) is the ratio of the two. The framework was applied to the comparable 12¼-in. sections of two anonymized land wells in Northern Kuwait (K-300) and the Eastern Venezuela Basin (V-100), measuring performance against design targets rather than raw operational values. An initial compilation of the inputs favored K-300 by an HEI ratio of 1.65. An audit of every input against the source documents found that the design programs belonged to analogous wells, that the V-100 loss figure combined all loss categories (3,146 bbl, of which 1,153 bbl went to the formation), and that the stability events used did not match the records of the interval. With audited inputs, the TRC was USD 359,485 for K-300 and USD 260,356 for V-100, and the HEI ratio was 0.77, favoring V-100. This result was insensitive to criterion weights, the stability penalty, the mud-weight metric, and the environmental proxy, but reversed (1.23) when the analogous plan was applied without scaling by drilled length; the full audited range was 0.53–1.41. The comparison between the two wells has no competitive intent: it is not a ranking or a competition between countries, regions, operators, or contractors, but a controlled methodological illustration showing that loss accounting and the time reference can outweigh the fluid data themselves, and that traceable data provenance makes such errors detectable. The results are illustrative and do not establish causality.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.