Constructing Selves in AI ‐Mediated Apprenticeship Learning: Students of Colour's Narratives of Agency, Recognition and Negotiation

ABSTRACT Background Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming computer‐assisted learning, yet little is known about how students of colour engage with AI within authentic educational settings. Existing research has focused primarily on academic integrity, efficiency and technological adoption, with comparatively less attention to students' own experiences of AI‐mediated learning. Objectives This study examined how students of colour in online apprenticeship programs constructed narratives of agency, recognition and negotiation while engaging with generative AI and what these experiences reveal about AI‐mediated learning within apprenticeship education. Methods A qualitative narrative inquiry was conducted over 9 months with five secondary school apprentices participating in online placements across healthcare, government, finance, technology and public service. Data comprised repeated narrative interviews, classroom observations, digital artifacts and field notes, which were analyzed using manual narrative coding. Results Three interconnected patterns emerged. First, students exercised agency by strategically using, refusing, verifying, revising and disclosing AI in ways that maintained authorship and credibility. Second, participants viewed AI as procedurally fair while also recognizing that generic responses often overlooked their cultural and linguistic identities. Third, students negotiated tensions between AI‐generated outputs and institutional expectations through continual verification and adaptation, while proposing design features that would better support transparency, learning and equitable participation. Conclusions The findings suggest that effective AI‐mediated learning extends beyond technical proficiency to include learners' capacity to exercise agency, establish legitimate authorship and experience meaningful recognition within educational contexts. The study introduces Institutional AI Literacy and Recognition Bandwidth as interpretive concepts for understanding how students of colour navigate AI within apprenticeship learning and highlights the importance of designing AI systems that support transparent, equitable and culturally responsive learning experiences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70351
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing Selves in AI ‐Mediated Apprenticeship Learning: Students of Colour's Narratives of Agency, Recognition and Negotiation

Eugene Kwasi Gyekye
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Constructing Selves in AI ‐Mediated Apprenticeship Learning: Students of Colour's Narratives of Agency, Recognition and Negotiation

Eugene Kwasi Gyekye
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming computer‐assisted learning, yet little is known about how students of colour engage with AI within authentic educational settings. Existing research has focused primarily on academic integrity, efficiency and technological adoption, with comparatively less attention to students' own experiences of AI‐mediated learning. Objectives This study examined how students of colour in online apprenticeship programs constructed narratives of agency, recognition and negotiation while engaging with generative AI and what these experiences reveal about AI‐mediated learning within apprenticeship education. Methods A qualitative narrative inquiry was conducted over 9 months with five secondary school apprentices participating in online placements across healthcare, government, finance, technology and public service. Data comprised repeated narrative interviews, classroom observations, digital artifacts and field notes, which were analyzed using manual narrative coding. Results Three interconnected patterns emerged. First, students exercised agency by strategically using, refusing, verifying, revising and disclosing AI in ways that maintained authorship and credibility. Second, participants viewed AI as procedurally fair while also recognizing that generic responses often overlooked their cultural and linguistic identities. Third, students negotiated tensions between AI‐generated outputs and institutional expectations through continual verification and adaptation, while proposing design features that would better support transparency, learning and equitable participation. Conclusions The findings suggest that effective AI‐mediated learning extends beyond technical proficiency to include learners' capacity to exercise agency, establish legitimate authorship and experience meaningful recognition within educational contexts. The study introduces Institutional AI Literacy and Recognition Bandwidth as interpretive concepts for understanding how students of colour navigate AI within apprenticeship learning and highlights the importance of designing AI systems that support transparent, equitable and culturally responsive learning experiences.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 42(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.