Discursive shifts and the normalisation of hate speech: Chinese Muslims in Chinese and American newspapers (2001–2024)

This paper examines how hate speech towards Chinese Muslims is constructed in Chinese and American broadsheets. The analysis encompasses 6336 articles (5.4 million words) published between 2001 and 2024. It employs a combination of discursive shifts theory, BiCHAT detection and LLM-assisted corpus-based discourse analysis to uncover patterns in the media coverage. Findings reveal that Chinese outlets showed higher hate speech probabilities targeting specific subgroups, while American newspapers portrayed Chinese Muslims monolithically. Both weaponised the concepts of violence and terrorism alongside nationally distinct topoi. Probabilities declined until 2014, then resurged in Chinese newspapers, while peaking in 2016 before decreasing in American outlets. These differences reflected distinct topoi usage across three discursive shifts. Chinese newspapers shifted from security threats to social impacts and, finally, to institutional measures. American outlets progressed from ethnic othering to sociopolitical burden to active threat. This study demonstrates the nexus between discriminatory discourse and China’s stability maintenance policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse Studies
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456261487865
Primary Topic
Media Discourse and Social Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discursive shifts and the normalisation of hate speech: Chinese Muslims in Chinese and American newspapers (2001–2024)

Meng Ye, Eric Friginal
Discourse Studies
Media Discourse and Social Analysis
article

Discursive shifts and the normalisation of hate speech: Chinese Muslims in Chinese and American newspapers (2001–2024)

Meng Ye, Eric Friginal
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how hate speech towards Chinese Muslims is constructed in Chinese and American broadsheets. The analysis encompasses 6336 articles (5.4 million words) published between 2001 and 2024. It employs a combination of discursive shifts theory, BiCHAT detection and LLM-assisted corpus-based discourse analysis to uncover patterns in the media coverage. Findings reveal that Chinese outlets showed higher hate speech probabilities targeting specific subgroups, while American newspapers portrayed Chinese Muslims monolithically. Both weaponised the concepts of violence and terrorism alongside nationally distinct topoi. Probabilities declined until 2014, then resurged in Chinese newspapers, while peaking in 2016 before decreasing in American outlets. These differences reflected distinct topoi usage across three discursive shifts. Chinese newspapers shifted from security threats to social impacts and, finally, to institutional measures. American outlets progressed from ethnic othering to sociopolitical burden to active threat. This study demonstrates the nexus between discriminatory discourse and China’s stability maintenance policies.

Discourse Studies
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Media Discourse and Social Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discursive shifts and the normalisation of hate speech: Chinese Muslims in Chinese and American newspapers (2001–2024) — Meng Ye, Eric Friginal · Discourse Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS