Mapping the Landscape of State-Level Cybersecurity Planning: An Analysis of 50 U.S. States from 2015 to 2021

The cybersecurity planning landscape across U.S. state governments is both critically important and surprisingly understudied. This article provides a systematic document-based comparative analysis of publicly available cybersecurity planning materials across all 50 U.S. states. It evaluates against a unified framework of eight best-practice themes: training, partnership, coordination and communication, developing awareness and culture, better equipment, leadership, funding, and national security. Using publicly accessible state cybersecurity planning documents collected as of December 2021, this study categorizes states into four archetypes (high, moderate, low, and minimal) based on the depth and comprehensiveness of their planning documents. The findings reveal striking structural heterogeneity across states, significant gaps in the coverage of critical themes, including leadership and funding, and a null relationship between political culture and the comprehensiveness of publicly available plans. The article concludes with policy implications for federal intergovernmental coordination and the future of national cybersecurity infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
State and Local Government Review
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x261490447
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Landscape of State-Level Cybersecurity Planning: An Analysis of 50 U.S. States from 2015 to 2021

Mesut Karakoç
State and Local Government Review
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Mapping the Landscape of State-Level Cybersecurity Planning: An Analysis of 50 U.S. States from 2015 to 2021

Mesut Karakoç
article en

Abstract

The cybersecurity planning landscape across U.S. state governments is both critically important and surprisingly understudied. This article provides a systematic document-based comparative analysis of publicly available cybersecurity planning materials across all 50 U.S. states. It evaluates against a unified framework of eight best-practice themes: training, partnership, coordination and communication, developing awareness and culture, better equipment, leadership, funding, and national security. Using publicly accessible state cybersecurity planning documents collected as of December 2021, this study categorizes states into four archetypes (high, moderate, low, and minimal) based on the depth and comprehensiveness of their planning documents. The findings reveal striking structural heterogeneity across states, significant gaps in the coverage of critical themes, including leadership and funding, and a null relationship between political culture and the comprehensiveness of publicly available plans. The article concludes with policy implications for federal intergovernmental coordination and the future of national cybersecurity infrastructure.

State and Local Government Review
Adana Science and Technology University (TR), University of Delaware (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mapping the Landscape of State-Level Cybersecurity Planning: An Analysis of 50 U.S. States from 2015 to 2021 — Mesut Karakoç · State and Local Government Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS