Two Faces of the Same Oxide: How Crystal Phase Defines the Nature of Proton Storage in MoO3

Abstract Proton storage in transition-metal oxides is often linked to fast proton transport, but how crystal phase governs structural evolution, electronic response, and kinetics remains insufficiently understood. Here, α-MoO3 and h-MoO3 are compared as model polymorphs to reveal phase-dependent proton-storage behavior. In situ XRD and state-resolved XPS show that α-MoO3 undergoes an initial irreversible structural reconstruction and then enters a reversible regime with lattice breathing and multivalent Mo redox, exhibiting battery-type behavior and favorable rate capability. In contrast, h-MoO3 rapidly loses long-range order after deep protonation, with poor structural recovery, limited Mo-valence evolution, and predominantly pseudocapacitive charge storage. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy coupled with distribution of relaxation times analysis and first-principles calculations further indicate that α-MoO3 preserves electronic delocalization and stronger electron–proton coupling, whereas h-MoO3 shows weakened electronic coherence and kinetically dispersed charge compensation. These findings identify structural/electronic coherence as a key criterion for high-performance proton storage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nano Letters
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6c03300
Primary Topic
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Faces of the Same Oxide: How Crystal Phase Defines the Nature of Proton Storage in MoO3

Yihua Gao, Zhongxi Li, Cong Liu, Zhi Zhang et al.
Nano Letters
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
article

Two Faces of the Same Oxide: How Crystal Phase Defines the Nature of Proton Storage in MoO3

Yihua Gao, Zhongxi Li, Cong Liu, Zhi Zhang, Huanyi Liao, Yuping Zhang, Yuan Yuan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Proton storage in transition-metal oxides is often linked to fast proton transport, but how crystal phase governs structural evolution, electronic response, and kinetics remains insufficiently understood. Here, α-MoO3 and h-MoO3 are compared as model polymorphs to reveal phase-dependent proton-storage behavior. In situ XRD and state-resolved XPS show that α-MoO3 undergoes an initial irreversible structural reconstruction and then enters a reversible regime with lattice breathing and multivalent Mo redox, exhibiting battery-type behavior and favorable rate capability. In contrast, h-MoO3 rapidly loses long-range order after deep protonation, with poor structural recovery, limited Mo-valence evolution, and predominantly pseudocapacitive charge storage. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy coupled with distribution of relaxation times analysis and first-principles calculations further indicate that α-MoO3 preserves electronic delocalization and stronger electron–proton coupling, whereas h-MoO3 shows weakened electronic coherence and kinetically dispersed charge compensation. These findings identify structural/electronic coherence as a key criterion for high-performance proton storage.

Nano Letters
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two Faces of the Same Oxide: How Crystal Phase Defines the Nature of Proton Storage in MoO3 — Yihua Gao, Zhongxi Li, et al. · Nano Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS