The Social Intelligence Reliance Halo: Perceived Social Understanding, Epistemic Trust, and Reliance Quality in Human–AI Decision Making

As generative AI systems become more socially responsive, personalized, and perspective-aware, a central question is whether such features improve human–AI decision quality or simply make AI advice more influential. This study introduces the Social Intelligence Reliance Halo as a proposed social-to-epistemic spillover pattern in which perceived social understanding functions as a non-diagnostic cue for epistemic evaluation: an AI that appears to understand the user may also be granted greater epistemic authority or reliability even when the relational cue provides no evidence of factual accuracy. A randomized two-condition experiment was conducted with 462 working adults with recent generative-AI experience. Participants interacted with either a High Social-Intelligence (High-SI) relational framing package or a Neutral AI across six repeated decision trials. Post-interaction measures assessed perceived social intelligence, epistemic authority, epistemic reliability, suspension of critical judgment, verification behavior, and AI literacy; trial-level behavioral reliance was analyzed with generalized estimating equations. The randomized High-SI package increased perceived social intelligence and increased advice-taking both when participants were initially correct and the contingent AI recommendation was wrong (OR = 1.507, p < .001) and when participants were initially incorrect and the recommendation was correct (OR = 1.800, p < .001). The Condition × participant-dependent advice-correctness interaction was nonsignificant (OR = 1.195, p = .289), providing no reliable evidence that the randomized treatment effect differed across these two states. Because recommendation correctness was mechanically determined by participants’ initial accuracy rather than independently randomized, this interaction is interpreted as exploratory treatment heterogeneity across participant-dependent correctness states rather than evidence that the High-SI package altered sensitivity to AI accuracy. Post-interaction perceived social intelligence was positively associated with epistemic authority and reliability, and AI literacy was associated with lower suspension of critical judgment and greater verification; these associations do not establish temporal or causal mediation. The study therefore provides experimental evidence that a bundled relational framing package can amplify both beneficial and harmful reliance, while the proposed social-to-epistemic pathway and accuracy-sensitive reliance remain questions for stronger future designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligence
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14100248
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Social Intelligence Reliance Halo: Perceived Social Understanding, Epistemic Trust, and Reliance Quality in Human–AI Decision Making

Filiz Mızrak, Hatice Gokce Demirel, Ayca Can Ozer Kirgiz
Journal of Intelligence
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

The Social Intelligence Reliance Halo: Perceived Social Understanding, Epistemic Trust, and Reliance Quality in Human–AI Decision Making

Filiz Mızrak, Hatice Gokce Demirel, Ayca Can Ozer Kirgiz
article en

Abstract

As generative AI systems become more socially responsive, personalized, and perspective-aware, a central question is whether such features improve human–AI decision quality or simply make AI advice more influential. This study introduces the Social Intelligence Reliance Halo as a proposed social-to-epistemic spillover pattern in which perceived social understanding functions as a non-diagnostic cue for epistemic evaluation: an AI that appears to understand the user may also be granted greater epistemic authority or reliability even when the relational cue provides no evidence of factual accuracy. A randomized two-condition experiment was conducted with 462 working adults with recent generative-AI experience. Participants interacted with either a High Social-Intelligence (High-SI) relational framing package or a Neutral AI across six repeated decision trials. Post-interaction measures assessed perceived social intelligence, epistemic authority, epistemic reliability, suspension of critical judgment, verification behavior, and AI literacy; trial-level behavioral reliance was analyzed with generalized estimating equations. The randomized High-SI package increased perceived social intelligence and increased advice-taking both when participants were initially correct and the contingent AI recommendation was wrong (OR = 1.507, p < .001) and when participants were initially incorrect and the recommendation was correct (OR = 1.800, p < .001). The Condition × participant-dependent advice-correctness interaction was nonsignificant (OR = 1.195, p = .289), providing no reliable evidence that the randomized treatment effect differed across these two states. Because recommendation correctness was mechanically determined by participants’ initial accuracy rather than independently randomized, this interaction is interpreted as exploratory treatment heterogeneity across participant-dependent correctness states rather than evidence that the High-SI package altered sensitivity to AI accuracy. Post-interaction perceived social intelligence was positively associated with epistemic authority and reliability, and AI literacy was associated with lower suspension of critical judgment and greater verification; these associations do not establish temporal or causal mediation. The study therefore provides experimental evidence that a bundled relational framing package can amplify both beneficial and harmful reliance, while the proposed social-to-epistemic pathway and accuracy-sensitive reliance remain questions for stronger future designs.

Journal of IntelligenceVol. 14(10)
Istanbul Kent University (TR), Elazığ Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Atlas Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.