Drug-specific resistance mechanisms to RET inhibitors in RET fusion-positive NSCLC

Abstract Purpose: Ret proto-oncogene (RET) fusions are highly heterogeneous oncogenic drivers occurring in approximately 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While selpercatinib and pralsetinib have dramatically improved clinical outcomes of patients, acquired resistance inevitably develops and effective therapeutic strategies following resistance remain limited. Understanding RET-dependent resistance mechanisms is critical for improving clinical outcomes for this patient population. Experimental Design: A rapid lentivirus-based mutagenesis approach, LentiMutate, was employed to identify potential secondary RET mutations conferring resistance to selective RET inhibitors (SRIs). Candidate resistance mutations were validated using Ba/F3 cell models. Biochemical and structural analysis were conducted to investigate the underlying mechanisms. Candidate mutations were evaluated against next-generation SRIs. Clinical responses after SRIs progression were retrospectively analyzed in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC using the MD Anderson real-world cohort. Results: We identified RET secondary mutations that induced SRIs resistance in a drug-specific manner. V804E/M mutations conferred resistance to selpercatinib while L730I/V and A883V mediated resistance to pralsetinib, with A883V representing a novel resistance mutation identified in this study. G810C/D/S, Y806N and E732K mutations induced resistance to both drugs. Molecular modeling suggested that both drug structure and fusion partner-mediated dimerization impacted differential sensitivity of secondary mutations. In a retrospective clinical cohort, one patient with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who acquired G810X mutations at progression on selpercatinib subsequently achieved a durable response to pralsetinib. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that secondary RET mutations can impart drug-specific effects on resistance to SRIs. These results underscore the need for precision therapy based on the specific resistance mutations present.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-2630
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drug-specific resistance mechanisms to RET inhibitors in RET fusion-positive NSCLC

Haniel Alves Araújo, Abeeb Abiodun Yekeen, Kenneth D. Westover, Monique B. Nilsson et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Drug-specific resistance mechanisms to RET inhibitors in RET fusion-positive NSCLC

Haniel Alves Araújo, Abeeb Abiodun Yekeen, Kenneth D. Westover, Monique B. Nilsson, John Victor Heymach, Ralf Kittler, Li Cai, Kaiwen Wang, Alvaro G. Paula, Ximeng Liu, Ashwani Kumar, Xiaofang Huo, Junqin He
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Ret proto-oncogene (RET) fusions are highly heterogeneous oncogenic drivers occurring in approximately 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While selpercatinib and pralsetinib have dramatically improved clinical outcomes of patients, acquired resistance inevitably develops and effective therapeutic strategies following resistance remain limited. Understanding RET-dependent resistance mechanisms is critical for improving clinical outcomes for this patient population. Experimental Design: A rapid lentivirus-based mutagenesis approach, LentiMutate, was employed to identify potential secondary RET mutations conferring resistance to selective RET inhibitors (SRIs). Candidate resistance mutations were validated using Ba/F3 cell models. Biochemical and structural analysis were conducted to investigate the underlying mechanisms. Candidate mutations were evaluated against next-generation SRIs. Clinical responses after SRIs progression were retrospectively analyzed in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC using the MD Anderson real-world cohort. Results: We identified RET secondary mutations that induced SRIs resistance in a drug-specific manner. V804E/M mutations conferred resistance to selpercatinib while L730I/V and A883V mediated resistance to pralsetinib, with A883V representing a novel resistance mutation identified in this study. G810C/D/S, Y806N and E732K mutations induced resistance to both drugs. Molecular modeling suggested that both drug structure and fusion partner-mediated dimerization impacted differential sensitivity of secondary mutations. In a retrospective clinical cohort, one patient with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who acquired G810X mutations at progression on selpercatinib subsequently achieved a durable response to pralsetinib. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that secondary RET mutations can impart drug-specific effects on resistance to SRIs. These results underscore the need for precision therapy based on the specific resistance mutations present.

Clinical Cancer Research
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.