Artificial intelligence in veterinary diagnostic histopathology: Concepts, applications, and clinical implementation

Artificial intelligence (AI) in human diagnostic histopathology has advanced rapidly, but clinical adoption has lagged behind research. Veterinary diagnostic pathology, being less regulated, could adopt AI faster, but the extent of its integration into diagnostic laboratories is unknown. This article combines a narrative introduction to key concepts, a scoping review of published applications, and an exploratory survey of diagnostic laboratories to provide an overview of AI in veterinary diagnostic histopathology. The narrative review highlights emerging approaches, including vision transformer-based foundation models and self-supervised learning, which may improve generalizability and reduce data requirements, although adaptation to the veterinary context remains challenging. The scoping review identified 34 studies published through a September 5, 2025, literature search, indicating steady but limited growth. Most used convolutional neural networks for relatively low-level tasks such as cell quantification, area measurement, and diagnosis. The survey had a low response rate (2 of 5 laboratories). Both respondents recognized potential benefits of AI. One laboratory had incorporated 2 AI models into routine diagnostic workflows and was evaluating additional applications, while the other had not yet implemented AI but was actively considering several models. Reported barriers included generalizability, latency, and cost. Overall, AI research in veterinary diagnostic histopathology is growing, but clinical adoption remains incompletely characterized. While less restrictive regulation may allow faster uptake than in human medicine, the lack of oversight places responsibility for validation on laboratories and pathologists. For trustworthy implementation, veterinary pathologists must understand AI fundamentals, and the field should prioritize standards for validation, transparency, and reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Pathology
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03009858261480625
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in veterinary diagnostic histopathology: Concepts, applications, and clinical implementation

Daniel G. Rudmann, Stefan M. Keller, J. Rachel Reader, Kevin L. Jacques et al.
Veterinary Pathology
AI in cancer detection
article

Artificial intelligence in veterinary diagnostic histopathology: Concepts, applications, and clinical implementation

Daniel G. Rudmann, Stefan M. Keller, J. Rachel Reader, Kevin L. Jacques, Judit Magnusson Wulcan, Jonatan Wulcan
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) in human diagnostic histopathology has advanced rapidly, but clinical adoption has lagged behind research. Veterinary diagnostic pathology, being less regulated, could adopt AI faster, but the extent of its integration into diagnostic laboratories is unknown. This article combines a narrative introduction to key concepts, a scoping review of published applications, and an exploratory survey of diagnostic laboratories to provide an overview of AI in veterinary diagnostic histopathology. The narrative review highlights emerging approaches, including vision transformer-based foundation models and self-supervised learning, which may improve generalizability and reduce data requirements, although adaptation to the veterinary context remains challenging. The scoping review identified 34 studies published through a September 5, 2025, literature search, indicating steady but limited growth. Most used convolutional neural networks for relatively low-level tasks such as cell quantification, area measurement, and diagnosis. The survey had a low response rate (2 of 5 laboratories). Both respondents recognized potential benefits of AI. One laboratory had incorporated 2 AI models into routine diagnostic workflows and was evaluating additional applications, while the other had not yet implemented AI but was actively considering several models. Reported barriers included generalizability, latency, and cost. Overall, AI research in veterinary diagnostic histopathology is growing, but clinical adoption remains incompletely characterized. While less restrictive regulation may allow faster uptake than in human medicine, the lack of oversight places responsibility for validation on laboratories and pathologists. For trustworthy implementation, veterinary pathologists must understand AI fundamentals, and the field should prioritize standards for validation, transparency, and reporting.

Veterinary Pathology
Sanofi (United States) (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.