Multiprofessional and interprofessional simulation training for advance care planning: a systematic review

Abstract Background Recent international guidelines describe advance care planning (ACP) as evolving from isolated communication tasks toward an iterative, collaborative process integrating goals-of-care (GOC) discussions, documentation, clinical and ethical reasoning. Simulation is a promising approach to support this evolution, yet its design and impact on ACP interprofessional collaborative practice remain unclear. This systematic review synthesised and evaluated the literature on multiprofessional and interprofessional simulation (MP-Sim, IP-Sim) for training healthcare students and professionals in ACP. Methods We addressed four questions on trainees, ACP tasks, simulation design, and outcomes. Six databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched from January 2010 to June 2025. Eligible studies used simulation with trainees from at least two professions to address ACP. Findings were synthesised using a Presage–Process–Product framework, and outcomes were classified according to Kirkpatrick’s levels. Study quality was appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Results 28 studies (11 MP-Sim, 17 IP-Sim) included 4,081 participants (83% professionals, 17% students), predominantly physicians and nurses. Simulation programs predominantly targeted GOC conversations, with limited integration of documentation and clinical and ethical reasoning. Most simulations were conducted in hospital settings. Despite heterogeneous methods, studies reported positive outcomes on learner satisfaction, attitudes toward communication and teamwork, and, in some studies, GOC documentation. MP-Sim primarily supported rehearsal of profession-specific ACP tasks, whereas IP-Sim more often enabled collaboration in dyads and teams. Conclusion Simulation-based ACP training can be conceptualized through a dual continuum comprising professional integration (from multiprofessional participation to interprofessional collaboration) and task integration (from communication-focused part-task rehearsal to whole-task ACP practice). This dual continuum provides a practical lens for guiding simulation design towards greater interprofessional collaboration and whole-task ACP practice. Designing simulations that integrate GOC communication, documentation, clinical and ethical reasoning with interprofessional collaboration within longitudinal, multi-stakeholder scenarios may better prepare students and professionals for contemporary ACP practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Simulation
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-026-00490-3
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiprofessional and interprofessional simulation training for advance care planning: a systematic review

Adeline Paignon, Tyler J. Albert, Thomas Fassier, Karen Lister et al.
Advances in Simulation
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Multiprofessional and interprofessional simulation training for advance care planning: a systematic review

Adeline Paignon, Tyler J. Albert, Thomas Fassier, Karen Lister, Anu Mehra
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent international guidelines describe advance care planning (ACP) as evolving from isolated communication tasks toward an iterative, collaborative process integrating goals-of-care (GOC) discussions, documentation, clinical and ethical reasoning. Simulation is a promising approach to support this evolution, yet its design and impact on ACP interprofessional collaborative practice remain unclear. This systematic review synthesised and evaluated the literature on multiprofessional and interprofessional simulation (MP-Sim, IP-Sim) for training healthcare students and professionals in ACP. Methods We addressed four questions on trainees, ACP tasks, simulation design, and outcomes. Six databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched from January 2010 to June 2025. Eligible studies used simulation with trainees from at least two professions to address ACP. Findings were synthesised using a Presage–Process–Product framework, and outcomes were classified according to Kirkpatrick’s levels. Study quality was appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Results 28 studies (11 MP-Sim, 17 IP-Sim) included 4,081 participants (83% professionals, 17% students), predominantly physicians and nurses. Simulation programs predominantly targeted GOC conversations, with limited integration of documentation and clinical and ethical reasoning. Most simulations were conducted in hospital settings. Despite heterogeneous methods, studies reported positive outcomes on learner satisfaction, attitudes toward communication and teamwork, and, in some studies, GOC documentation. MP-Sim primarily supported rehearsal of profession-specific ACP tasks, whereas IP-Sim more often enabled collaboration in dyads and teams. Conclusion Simulation-based ACP training can be conceptualized through a dual continuum comprising professional integration (from multiprofessional participation to interprofessional collaboration) and task integration (from communication-focused part-task rehearsal to whole-task ACP practice). This dual continuum provides a practical lens for guiding simulation design towards greater interprofessional collaboration and whole-task ACP practice. Designing simulations that integrate GOC communication, documentation, clinical and ethical reasoning with interprofessional collaboration within longitudinal, multi-stakeholder scenarios may better prepare students and professionals for contemporary ACP practice.

Advances in Simulation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.