The Missing Evidence Layer of the UN 2030 Agenda: How Decision Basis Records could make institutional accountability portable

The Missing Evidence Layer of the UN 2030 Agenda examines a gap in the infrastructure used when consequential institutional decisions cross organizational, national, or machine boundaries. Institutions have increasingly shared ways to establish identity, move money, and exchange data, but no generally adopted, sector-neutral way to carry what an authoritative decision stood on: who decided, under what authority and rule, on what evidence, whether the decision remains valid, and, where artificial intelligence was involved, which model was used and what a person did with its output. The paper proposes a decision-evidence layer that would sit alongside existing systems rather than replace them. It would carry two portable records: a Decision Basis Record (DBR), created by the deciding institution, and a Reliance Record, created by the receiving institution to record whether it could verify the decision basis and whether it relied on it, for what purpose and under which rule. The proposal is not a software platform, shared database, blockchain, or replacement for existing institutional systems. It is an underlying interoperability layer intended to allow decision evidence to move across existing and future systems while the underlying data remains with the institutions that hold it. The paper connects this proposed infrastructure to United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16, particularly the goals of effective, accountable and transparent institutions, and examines its implications for artificial intelligence governance, digital public infrastructure, institutional reliance, public accountability, and the risk of a growing decision evidence divide between institutions that can prove how they decided and those that cannot. The broader claim remains a hypothesis. The research is based on more than eighty practitioner interviews weighted toward insurance, and the paper proposes a six-month field study involving development-bank co-financing decisions to test whether decision evidence can travel in a form another institution can check and rely on without reopening the original file.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23247686
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Missing Evidence Layer of the UN 2030 Agenda: How Decision Basis Records could make institutional accountability portable

Alexander Barrett
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
E-Government and Public Services
article

The Missing Evidence Layer of the UN 2030 Agenda: How Decision Basis Records could make institutional accountability portable

Alexander Barrett
article en

Abstract

The Missing Evidence Layer of the UN 2030 Agenda examines a gap in the infrastructure used when consequential institutional decisions cross organizational, national, or machine boundaries. Institutions have increasingly shared ways to establish identity, move money, and exchange data, but no generally adopted, sector-neutral way to carry what an authoritative decision stood on: who decided, under what authority and rule, on what evidence, whether the decision remains valid, and, where artificial intelligence was involved, which model was used and what a person did with its output. The paper proposes a decision-evidence layer that would sit alongside existing systems rather than replace them. It would carry two portable records: a Decision Basis Record (DBR), created by the deciding institution, and a Reliance Record, created by the receiving institution to record whether it could verify the decision basis and whether it relied on it, for what purpose and under which rule. The proposal is not a software platform, shared database, blockchain, or replacement for existing institutional systems. It is an underlying interoperability layer intended to allow decision evidence to move across existing and future systems while the underlying data remains with the institutions that hold it. The paper connects this proposed infrastructure to United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16, particularly the goals of effective, accountable and transparent institutions, and examines its implications for artificial intelligence governance, digital public infrastructure, institutional reliance, public accountability, and the risk of a growing decision evidence divide between institutions that can prove how they decided and those that cannot. The broader claim remains a hypothesis. The research is based on more than eighty practitioner interviews weighted toward insurance, and the paper proposes a six-month field study involving development-bank co-financing decisions to test whether decision evidence can travel in a form another institution can check and rely on without reopening the original file.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.