Developing a Workplace Institutional Betrayal Measure Using a Survivor-Led Qualitative Methodology

Institutional betrayal, a concept coined by Jennifer Freyd, has been used to understand institutional responses to sexual violence predominantly in a university setting and specific workplaces (e.g., military). The Institutional Betrayal Questionnaire (IBQ) has been essential in quantitatively measuring survivors’ experiences of institutional betrayal and understanding institutional responses, but it has not been widely applied to workplaces. Additionally, most quantitative researchers create measures without input from the population they seek to study, resulting in a top-down approach to research that has been criticized, particularly when done with marginalized populations. The current study developed an adapted version of the IBQ as applied to workplaces. In doing so, we directly sought input from survivors on how the original IBQ may be modified to more adequately reflect their experiences with reporting sexual assault in the workplace. We identified four relevant themes from 23 interviews with participants who reported their sexual assault in the workplace. These four themes included: clarity of measure, endorsing additional measure items during the interview, suggestions for additional or revised items for the IBQ-Workplace measure, and other methodological considerations. We present an updated version of the IBQ for workplaces based on survivor feedback and discuss future directions for survivor-led research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843261485273
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a Workplace Institutional Betrayal Measure Using a Survivor-Led Qualitative Methodology

Erin T. O’Callaghan, Veronica Shepp, Katherine Lorenz
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Developing a Workplace Institutional Betrayal Measure Using a Survivor-Led Qualitative Methodology

Erin T. O’Callaghan, Veronica Shepp, Katherine Lorenz
article en

Abstract

Institutional betrayal, a concept coined by Jennifer Freyd, has been used to understand institutional responses to sexual violence predominantly in a university setting and specific workplaces (e.g., military). The Institutional Betrayal Questionnaire (IBQ) has been essential in quantitatively measuring survivors’ experiences of institutional betrayal and understanding institutional responses, but it has not been widely applied to workplaces. Additionally, most quantitative researchers create measures without input from the population they seek to study, resulting in a top-down approach to research that has been criticized, particularly when done with marginalized populations. The current study developed an adapted version of the IBQ as applied to workplaces. In doing so, we directly sought input from survivors on how the original IBQ may be modified to more adequately reflect their experiences with reporting sexual assault in the workplace. We identified four relevant themes from 23 interviews with participants who reported their sexual assault in the workplace. These four themes included: clarity of measure, endorsing additional measure items during the interview, suggestions for additional or revised items for the IBQ-Workplace measure, and other methodological considerations. We present an updated version of the IBQ for workplaces based on survivor feedback and discuss future directions for survivor-led research.

Psychology of Women Quarterly
California State University, Northridge (US), Montana State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.