The relationship between EU fiscal transfers and the European policy profile of political parties

This research note examines how fiscal transfers within the European Union shape the programmatic strategies of domestic political parties. We argue that a country’s net-contributor or net-receiving status conditions the strategies how parties articulate their positions on European integration. In net-receiving states, Euroskeptic parties strategically mute EU-related rhetoric to avoid undermining their broader policy stance. Moreover, the increase in pro-EU positions among parties in net-receiving states is driven mainly by support for further EU-level redistribution. We evaluate these claims using Chapel Hill Expert Survey data from 2002–2024 and a regression discontinuity design that uses continuous measures of net contributions to the EU budget. The empirical analyses, in which we also test for a linear relationship, align with our expectations. Euroskeptic parties mention the EU less in net-receiving contexts while beneficiary status solely shifts party positions toward pro-redistribution preferences at the EU level. These results illustrate how Euroskeptic parties cope with the potential positive impacts of the EU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Party Politics
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688261492177
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between EU fiscal transfers and the European policy profile of political parties

Marc Debus, Johannes Lattmann
Party Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
article

The relationship between EU fiscal transfers and the European policy profile of political parties

Marc Debus, Johannes Lattmann
article en

Abstract

This research note examines how fiscal transfers within the European Union shape the programmatic strategies of domestic political parties. We argue that a country’s net-contributor or net-receiving status conditions the strategies how parties articulate their positions on European integration. In net-receiving states, Euroskeptic parties strategically mute EU-related rhetoric to avoid undermining their broader policy stance. Moreover, the increase in pro-EU positions among parties in net-receiving states is driven mainly by support for further EU-level redistribution. We evaluate these claims using Chapel Hill Expert Survey data from 2002–2024 and a regression discontinuity design that uses continuous measures of net contributions to the EU budget. The empirical analyses, in which we also test for a linear relationship, align with our expectations. Euroskeptic parties mention the EU less in net-receiving contexts while beneficiary status solely shifts party positions toward pro-redistribution preferences at the EU level. These results illustrate how Euroskeptic parties cope with the potential positive impacts of the EU.

Party Politics
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Mannheim (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The relationship between EU fiscal transfers and the European policy profile of political parties — Marc Debus, Johannes Lattmann · Party Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS