Nature and Hiding: Comparative Phenomenology of a Sāṃkhya Philosophy Through Heraclitus

This article examines the concept of prakṛti in Sāṃkhya philosophy, comparing it with the notion of nature in Heraclitus’ thought. The analysis focuses on Heraclitus’ famous fragment DK B123 which is interpreted as an expression of the continual becoming of nature, whose essence remains concealed within a process of perpetual transformation. This idea finds a parallel in the conception of prakṛti as ‘subtle’ or ‘modest’ in Sāṃkhya, understood as a dynamic principle in a state of constant evolution. By drawing a comparison with Heraclitus, the article underscores the intrinsic dynamism of prakṛti and its relationship with puruṣa, the conscious principle. Furthermore, the article offers a new interpretation of Heraclitus’ fragment, suggesting that the verb φιλεῖ does not imply an intentional action on the part of nature, but rather denotes a tendency or a spontaneous process. The comparison between Sāṃkhya and Heraclitus ultimately opens new perspectives on possible connections between Greek and Indian thought, paving the way for future studies and debates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophies
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11050181
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nature and Hiding: Comparative Phenomenology of a Sāṃkhya Philosophy Through Heraclitus

Federico Divino
Philosophies
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Nature and Hiding: Comparative Phenomenology of a Sāṃkhya Philosophy Through Heraclitus

Federico Divino
article en

Abstract

This article examines the concept of prakṛti in Sāṃkhya philosophy, comparing it with the notion of nature in Heraclitus’ thought. The analysis focuses on Heraclitus’ famous fragment DK B123 which is interpreted as an expression of the continual becoming of nature, whose essence remains concealed within a process of perpetual transformation. This idea finds a parallel in the conception of prakṛti as ‘subtle’ or ‘modest’ in Sāṃkhya, understood as a dynamic principle in a state of constant evolution. By drawing a comparison with Heraclitus, the article underscores the intrinsic dynamism of prakṛti and its relationship with puruṣa, the conscious principle. Furthermore, the article offers a new interpretation of Heraclitus’ fragment, suggesting that the verb φιλεῖ does not imply an intentional action on the part of nature, but rather denotes a tendency or a spontaneous process. The comparison between Sāṃkhya and Heraclitus ultimately opens new perspectives on possible connections between Greek and Indian thought, paving the way for future studies and debates.

PhilosophiesVol. 11(5)
University of Antwerp (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.