Metabolically Controlled Oncological Treatment: An Evidence-Graded Framework Integrating Metabolic Reprogramming, Targeted Drug Delivery, and Standard Oncological Care

Cancer cells exhibit metabolic reprogramming, including increased aerobic glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and altered lipid metabolism, which supports tumor growth and contributes to immune evasion. A growing but heterogeneous body of literature has investigated whether targeting these metabolic dependencies alongside standard oncologic treatment may provide therapeutic benefit. This review critically examines clinically investigated metabolically directed approaches, including metronomic chemotherapy, hyperthermia, high-dose intravenous vitamin C, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, fasting-related nutritional strategies, ketogenic diets, and insulin-based approaches, while distinguishing them from established targeted therapies, monoclonal antibodies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging immunometabolic and microenvironmental targets are also discussed, including lactate transport, ferroptosis, autophagy and amino acid metabolism, cancer-associated fibroblasts, tumor-associated macrophages, abnormal vasculature, and immunosuppressive cytokine signaling. In addition, drug-delivery strategies are considered by distinguishing the established pharmaceutical role of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent or excipient from nanoparticle-, exosome-, and peptide-based targeting platforms. Available evidence is characterized according to clinical maturity, ranging from established phase III-supported therapies and randomized clinical evidence to early-phase, preclinical, or currently unproven approaches. Although several metabolically directed interventions have biological rationale and varying degrees of clinical support, no comprehensive multicomponent metabolic regimen has been validated in controlled clinical trials. Future development should prioritize stepwise, biomarker-informed prospective studies evaluating individual interventions and biologically justified combinations alongside standard-of-care therapy. Metabolically directed strategies should therefore be interpreted according to the evidence supporting each component rather than as a single established therapeutic regimen.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Molecules
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31213970
Primary Topic
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metabolically Controlled Oncological Treatment: An Evidence-Graded Framework Integrating Metabolic Reprogramming, Targeted Drug Delivery, and Standard Oncological Care

Thomas N. Seyfried, Oral Öncül, Tomás Duraj, Sena Şen et al.
2 links
Molecules
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
article

Metabolically Controlled Oncological Treatment: An Evidence-Graded Framework Integrating Metabolic Reprogramming, Targeted Drug Delivery, and Standard Oncological Care

Thomas N. Seyfried, Oral Öncül, Tomás Duraj, Sena Şen, Sirin Budak, Mehmet Salih İyikesici
article en

Abstract

Cancer cells exhibit metabolic reprogramming, including increased aerobic glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and altered lipid metabolism, which supports tumor growth and contributes to immune evasion. A growing but heterogeneous body of literature has investigated whether targeting these metabolic dependencies alongside standard oncologic treatment may provide therapeutic benefit. This review critically examines clinically investigated metabolically directed approaches, including metronomic chemotherapy, hyperthermia, high-dose intravenous vitamin C, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, fasting-related nutritional strategies, ketogenic diets, and insulin-based approaches, while distinguishing them from established targeted therapies, monoclonal antibodies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging immunometabolic and microenvironmental targets are also discussed, including lactate transport, ferroptosis, autophagy and amino acid metabolism, cancer-associated fibroblasts, tumor-associated macrophages, abnormal vasculature, and immunosuppressive cytokine signaling. In addition, drug-delivery strategies are considered by distinguishing the established pharmaceutical role of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent or excipient from nanoparticle-, exosome-, and peptide-based targeting platforms. Available evidence is characterized according to clinical maturity, ranging from established phase III-supported therapies and randomized clinical evidence to early-phase, preclinical, or currently unproven approaches. Although several metabolically directed interventions have biological rationale and varying degrees of clinical support, no comprehensive multicomponent metabolic regimen has been validated in controlled clinical trials. Future development should prioritize stepwise, biomarker-informed prospective studies evaluating individual interventions and biologically justified combinations alongside standard-of-care therapy. Metabolically directed strategies should therefore be interpreted according to the evidence supporting each component rather than as a single established therapeutic regimen.

MoleculesVol. 31(21)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon