PARIS (POSTERIOR MALLEOLUS RADIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION STUDY): STANDARDIZING MANAGEMENT OF UNSTABLE ANKLE FRACTURES WITH A POSTERIOR MALLEOLUS COMPONENT

The PARIS algorithm is used to classify posterior malleolar fractures (PMF) and guide fixation planning based on plain radiographs, with reassessment following pre-operative computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to validate and optimise the PARIS algorithm to determine which ankle fractures with associated PMF require pre-operative CT imaging and fixation. This prospective, pragmatic, observational cohort study was conducted at a large academic trauma centre. Adult patients (≥16 years) presenting with an isolated unstable ankle fracture and associated PMF were recruited. All patients underwent pre-operative CT. Data collected included demographics, fracture classification, and clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes up to one-year post-surgery. PMF classification and treatment plans based on plain radiographs were recorded and compared with those following CT assessment. A total of 120 patients were included, with a mean age of 51.5 years (22–81); 73.3% were female. Due to the pragmatic design, 98 patients (82%) were managed according to the PARIS algorithm, while 22 (18%) were not. Pre-operative CT altered the radiograph-based classification or treatment plan in only 10% of cases (12/120). In the non-algorithm group, the median PMF size was significantly larger (19.0% vs 9.4%; p<0.001), with a higher fixation rate (90.0% vs 15.3%; p<0.001). However, CT changed the fixation plan in only 7 of these 22 cases. Infection rates were significantly lower in patients managed according to the algorithm (9.2% vs 27.3%, p=0.020). Post-operative reduction and rates of post-traumatic osteoarthritis at six months were comparable between groups. At one year, Olerud Molander Ankle Scores were superior in the algorithm group (85 vs 65), although not statistically significant (p=0.120). Use of the PARIS algorithm resulted in lower complication rates with comparable radiographic and clinical outcomes. Routine CT is not necessary for all PMFs; selective imaging in larger or more complex fractures appears sufficient to guide fixation decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2026.9.011
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PARIS (POSTERIOR MALLEOLUS RADIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION STUDY): STANDARDIZING MANAGEMENT OF UNSTABLE ANKLE FRACTURES WITH A POSTERIOR MALLEOLUS COMPONENT

Timothy O. White, Anish K. Amin, Nicholas R. Heinz, Andrew David Duckworth
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

PARIS (POSTERIOR MALLEOLUS RADIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION STUDY): STANDARDIZING MANAGEMENT OF UNSTABLE ANKLE FRACTURES WITH A POSTERIOR MALLEOLUS COMPONENT

Timothy O. White, Anish K. Amin, Nicholas R. Heinz, Andrew David Duckworth
article en

Abstract

The PARIS algorithm is used to classify posterior malleolar fractures (PMF) and guide fixation planning based on plain radiographs, with reassessment following pre-operative computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to validate and optimise the PARIS algorithm to determine which ankle fractures with associated PMF require pre-operative CT imaging and fixation. This prospective, pragmatic, observational cohort study was conducted at a large academic trauma centre. Adult patients (≥16 years) presenting with an isolated unstable ankle fracture and associated PMF were recruited. All patients underwent pre-operative CT. Data collected included demographics, fracture classification, and clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes up to one-year post-surgery. PMF classification and treatment plans based on plain radiographs were recorded and compared with those following CT assessment. A total of 120 patients were included, with a mean age of 51.5 years (22–81); 73.3% were female. Due to the pragmatic design, 98 patients (82%) were managed according to the PARIS algorithm, while 22 (18%) were not. Pre-operative CT altered the radiograph-based classification or treatment plan in only 10% of cases (12/120). In the non-algorithm group, the median PMF size was significantly larger (19.0% vs 9.4%; p<0.001), with a higher fixation rate (90.0% vs 15.3%; p<0.001). However, CT changed the fixation plan in only 7 of these 22 cases. Infection rates were significantly lower in patients managed according to the algorithm (9.2% vs 27.3%, p=0.020). Post-operative reduction and rates of post-traumatic osteoarthritis at six months were comparable between groups. At one year, Olerud Molander Ankle Scores were superior in the algorithm group (85 vs 65), although not statistically significant (p=0.120). Use of the PARIS algorithm resulted in lower complication rates with comparable radiographic and clinical outcomes. Routine CT is not necessary for all PMFs; selective imaging in larger or more complex fractures appears sufficient to guide fixation decisions.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 108-B(SUPP_9)
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.