Scalable Scenario‐Based Regional Earthquake Risk Assessment via Gaussianized Ground‐Motion‐Damage Modeling and PPCA

ABSTRACT In scenario‐based regional risk modeling, the traditional workflow simulates spatially correlated ground motions, and subsequently samples building damage states from lognormal fragility functions. In this procedure, the dimensionality grows with the number of assets () and quickly becomes computationally prohibitive for large cities. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a scalable computational framework that (i) recasts the traditional two‐step (ground‐motion, then damage) simulation as a single, ‐dimensional Gaussian sampling problem via an exact change of variables, and (ii) identifies low‐dimensional latent variables that make this sampling efficient by employing probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA). We validate the proposed approach on San Francisco's downtown portfolio of 1000 buildings, benchmarking against SimCenter R2D's computational testbed. The modal damage states of 95% buildings match exactly, with a mean difference below 0.04 (on a 0–4 ordinal scale representing none to complete damage), confirming the framework's accuracy. In tests on downtown San Francisco (15,836 buildings) and the broader Bay Area, a single latent dimension and 20 dimensions, respectively, reproduce the benchmark loss distributions within . The achievable dimensionality reduction depends primarily on the portfolio's spatial extent rather than building density. As a result, the computational complexity drops by one order in relative to the traditional approach – from to in the pre‐processing step and from to in the simulation step, where is the number of simulations. For 30,000 buildings, the method yields roughly faster pre‐processing and faster simulation, with speedups growing linearly with portfolio size, resulting in faster total computation time for , compared to the traditional framework. Overall, the framework substantially lowers the computational barrier for regional seismic risk assessment of dense urban building portfolios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.70305
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scalable Scenario‐Based Regional Earthquake Risk Assessment via Gaussianized Ground‐Motion‐Damage Modeling and PPCA

Luis Ceferino, Soung Eil Houng
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Scalable Scenario‐Based Regional Earthquake Risk Assessment via Gaussianized Ground‐Motion‐Damage Modeling and PPCA

Luis Ceferino, Soung Eil Houng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In scenario‐based regional risk modeling, the traditional workflow simulates spatially correlated ground motions, and subsequently samples building damage states from lognormal fragility functions. In this procedure, the dimensionality grows with the number of assets () and quickly becomes computationally prohibitive for large cities. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a scalable computational framework that (i) recasts the traditional two‐step (ground‐motion, then damage) simulation as a single, ‐dimensional Gaussian sampling problem via an exact change of variables, and (ii) identifies low‐dimensional latent variables that make this sampling efficient by employing probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA). We validate the proposed approach on San Francisco's downtown portfolio of 1000 buildings, benchmarking against SimCenter R2D's computational testbed. The modal damage states of 95% buildings match exactly, with a mean difference below 0.04 (on a 0–4 ordinal scale representing none to complete damage), confirming the framework's accuracy. In tests on downtown San Francisco (15,836 buildings) and the broader Bay Area, a single latent dimension and 20 dimensions, respectively, reproduce the benchmark loss distributions within . The achievable dimensionality reduction depends primarily on the portfolio's spatial extent rather than building density. As a result, the computational complexity drops by one order in relative to the traditional approach – from to in the pre‐processing step and from to in the simulation step, where is the number of simulations. For 30,000 buildings, the method yields roughly faster pre‐processing and faster simulation, with speedups growing linearly with portfolio size, resulting in faster total computation time for , compared to the traditional framework. Overall, the framework substantially lowers the computational barrier for regional seismic risk assessment of dense urban building portfolios.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.