Lost and Found in Translation: The Early French and German Reception of Robert Dodsley's The Oeconomy of Human Life

Abstract Drawing on a corpus of five French and five German eighteenth‐century versions of Robert Dodsley's The Oeconomy of Human Life , this article examines the work's early European reception through the combined perspectives of book history, translation history, and translation criticism. The French and German texts are analysed as situated acts of moral mediation shaped by target readerships, publishing contexts, paratextual framing, and differing understandings of translational fidelity. The article distinguishes between several forms of textual transformation: source‐oriented rendering, reader‐oriented adaptation, rhetorical intensification, indirect translation, editorial reframing, and textual corruption. It argues that the French and German versions of The Oeconomy formed a dynamic multilingual text family, in which Dodsley's moral‐philosophical bestseller was repeatedly repurposed for different courtly, commercial, pedagogical, and literary environments. The case shows how a single, unusually mobile moral text makes visible the plurality of translation practices through which Enlightenment moral discourse circulated across linguistic and cultural boundaries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-0208.70077
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost and Found in Translation: The Early French and German Reception of Robert Dodsley's The Oeconomy of Human Life

Réka Lengyel
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Lost and Found in Translation: The Early French and German Reception of Robert Dodsley's The Oeconomy of Human Life

Réka Lengyel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on a corpus of five French and five German eighteenth‐century versions of Robert Dodsley's The Oeconomy of Human Life , this article examines the work's early European reception through the combined perspectives of book history, translation history, and translation criticism. The French and German texts are analysed as situated acts of moral mediation shaped by target readerships, publishing contexts, paratextual framing, and differing understandings of translational fidelity. The article distinguishes between several forms of textual transformation: source‐oriented rendering, reader‐oriented adaptation, rhetorical intensification, indirect translation, editorial reframing, and textual corruption. It argues that the French and German versions of The Oeconomy formed a dynamic multilingual text family, in which Dodsley's moral‐philosophical bestseller was repeatedly repurposed for different courtly, commercial, pedagogical, and literary environments. The case shows how a single, unusually mobile moral text makes visible the plurality of translation practices through which Enlightenment moral discourse circulated across linguistic and cultural boundaries.

Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lost and Found in Translation: The Early French and German Reception of Robert Dodsley's The Oeconomy of Human Life — Réka Lengyel · Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS