Nicotine replacement therapy sampling for cigarette cessation in dental care: A National Dental Practice‐Based Research Network cluster randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cigarette smoking is detrimental to oral health. Oral health professionals rarely prescribe smoking cessation medications. Nicotine replacement therapy sampling (NRTS), providing brief starter courses of NRT, could improve provision of NRT and promote cessation. The aim of the Free Samples for Health (FreSH) study was to test the effectiveness of NRTS compared with enhanced usual care on long-term abstinence from combustible tobacco. DESIGN: Two-group, pragmatic, cluster (dental practice) randomized clinical trial. SETTING: The study was conducted in the Midwest and Northeast nodes of the United States' National Dental Practice-Based Research Network in 59 dental practices. Practices were randomized to intervention condition. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (recruited June 2023-June 2025) were adult patients of network practices who smoke cigarettes daily [n = 1196; NRTS n = 486, comparison group (ET) n = 710; 59% female; 71% White]. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: All participants received Ask-Advise-Refer: oral health practitioners asked smoking status, advised quitting and referred to state tobacco quitlines. Participants in the NRTS group were given a 2-week supply of 14 mg nicotine patches and 4 mg nicotine lozenges; participants in the ET group were given an electric toothbrush. MEASUREMENTS: Participants were surveyed after their visit and at 1, 3 and 6 months post enrollment. The primary outcome was 7-day point-prevalence abstinence measured 6 months post enrollment confirmed via expired breath carbon monoxide (CO) < 6 p.p.m. Secondary outcomes included quit attempts, short-term abstinence, NRT and quitline use. Covariates included stage of change, confidence, readiness and cigarettes per day. RESULTS: While there was no condition effect on CO-confirmed abstinence at 6 months post intervention [NRTS: 8.4%, ET: 8.0%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.65-2.09], the NRTS intervention statistically significantly increased NRT use across all timepoints (NRTS: 50%, ET: 13%; aOR = 7.39, 95% CI = 5.29-10.31) and quit attempts at all timepoints (NRTS: 58%, ET: 49%; aOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.06-2.02). There was a statistically significant effect of NRTS on self-reported 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 1 month post enrollment (NRTS: 12.8%, ET: 9.0%; aOR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.03-2.88). There was no difference in quitline use. Practices assigned to the NRTS condition recruited notably fewer participants (t = 2.11, P = 0.04). SUMMARY: Free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) samples are not sufficient to improve long-term smoking abstinence in dental patients; however, NRT samples increase engagement with quitting behaviors and may serve as a starting point toward quitting. Low recruitment in the NRT sampling group demonstrates discomfort by oral health practitioners in discussing smoking among those not voicing readiness to quit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addiction
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70618
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nicotine replacement therapy sampling for cigarette cessation in dental care: A National Dental Practice‐Based Research Network cluster randomized clinical trial

Douglas E. Levy, Ning Smith, Donald Brad Rindal, Tamara Lischka et al.
Addiction
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Nicotine replacement therapy sampling for cigarette cessation in dental care: A National Dental Practice‐Based Research Network cluster randomized clinical trial

Douglas E. Levy, Ning Smith, Donald Brad Rindal, Tamara Lischka, Dorota T. Kopycka‐Kędzierawski, Jennifer Dahne, Sarah Ashley Helseth, Sandra J. Japuntich, Matthew J. Carpenter, Melissa Adkins-Hempel, Arthur Truong, Pearl Fang, Denis B. Nyongesa, Emily Welle, Sarah Basile, Peggy S. Richardson, Rosa Gerdts, Devyn Fernholz, The National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group, Natalia Gutierrez Sacasa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cigarette smoking is detrimental to oral health. Oral health professionals rarely prescribe smoking cessation medications. Nicotine replacement therapy sampling (NRTS), providing brief starter courses of NRT, could improve provision of NRT and promote cessation. The aim of the Free Samples for Health (FreSH) study was to test the effectiveness of NRTS compared with enhanced usual care on long-term abstinence from combustible tobacco. DESIGN: Two-group, pragmatic, cluster (dental practice) randomized clinical trial. SETTING: The study was conducted in the Midwest and Northeast nodes of the United States' National Dental Practice-Based Research Network in 59 dental practices. Practices were randomized to intervention condition. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (recruited June 2023-June 2025) were adult patients of network practices who smoke cigarettes daily [n = 1196; NRTS n = 486, comparison group (ET) n = 710; 59% female; 71% White]. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: All participants received Ask-Advise-Refer: oral health practitioners asked smoking status, advised quitting and referred to state tobacco quitlines. Participants in the NRTS group were given a 2-week supply of 14 mg nicotine patches and 4 mg nicotine lozenges; participants in the ET group were given an electric toothbrush. MEASUREMENTS: Participants were surveyed after their visit and at 1, 3 and 6 months post enrollment. The primary outcome was 7-day point-prevalence abstinence measured 6 months post enrollment confirmed via expired breath carbon monoxide (CO) < 6 p.p.m. Secondary outcomes included quit attempts, short-term abstinence, NRT and quitline use. Covariates included stage of change, confidence, readiness and cigarettes per day. RESULTS: While there was no condition effect on CO-confirmed abstinence at 6 months post intervention [NRTS: 8.4%, ET: 8.0%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.65-2.09], the NRTS intervention statistically significantly increased NRT use across all timepoints (NRTS: 50%, ET: 13%; aOR = 7.39, 95% CI = 5.29-10.31) and quit attempts at all timepoints (NRTS: 58%, ET: 49%; aOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.06-2.02). There was a statistically significant effect of NRTS on self-reported 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 1 month post enrollment (NRTS: 12.8%, ET: 9.0%; aOR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.03-2.88). There was no difference in quitline use. Practices assigned to the NRTS condition recruited notably fewer participants (t = 2.11, P = 0.04). SUMMARY: Free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) samples are not sufficient to improve long-term smoking abstinence in dental patients; however, NRT samples increase engagement with quitting behaviors and may serve as a starting point toward quitting. Low recruitment in the NRT sampling group demonstrates discomfort by oral health practitioners in discussing smoking among those not voicing readiness to quit.

Addiction
Northwestern University (US), University of Minnesota (US), Harvard University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), MUSC Hollings Cancer Center (US), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (US), HealthPartners (US), University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.