Specialists’ agreement and construct validation of a visual scale for assessing mucosal healing after third molar extraction

Abstract Objective To present and validate a digital visual scale for evaluating mucosal wound repair after mandibular third molar extraction. The research seeks to establish a standard-based tool to improve communication in clinical practice and research by reducing subjectivity in postoperative assessments. Materials and methods A digital image scale using four clinical inflammatory stages (Scores 0 to 3) of recovering oral mucosa of tooth extractions sites was construct. Employing electronic forms ( n = 300) were sent to dentists to assess agreement with the consensus score, and construct validity in six tooth extraction mucosal wounds examined by specialists or not. Construct validation involved specialists who evaluated the scale’s utility, graphic quality, and clinical significance via a 5-point Likert scale. There was a total of eighty-three responses for the agreement consensus, and sixty-seven for construct validation. Results The scale demonstrated a “fair” inter-rater agreement with a Fleiss’ Kappa of 0.3018. The average agreement was 64.3%, with high agreement (> 80%) for advanced repair stages (Score 3) and greater variability for intermediate stages (Scores 1 and 2). Validation results showed high acceptance, with 96.6% of participants agreeing on the tool’s utility for standardization. There was agreement between specialists and general practitioners. The initial scores may require further descriptive refinement to reduce interpretive overlap but under observer’s calibration it can be used across different dental specialties. Conclusions The proposed digital scale showed high professional acceptance and potential usefulness for standardizing the assessment of mucosal healing after third molar surgery. Clinical relevance By providing a standardized visual reference, this scale facilitates the early detection of healing deviations or postoperative complications and rationalizes clinical documentation in professional practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2026-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-026-01647-0
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Specialists’ agreement and construct validation of a visual scale for assessing mucosal healing after third molar extraction

Natacha Kalline de Oliveira, Lais Albuquerque FERNANDES, Luciana Côrrea, Maria Cristina Zindel Deboni et al.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Specialists’ agreement and construct validation of a visual scale for assessing mucosal healing after third molar extraction

Natacha Kalline de Oliveira, Lais Albuquerque FERNANDES, Luciana Côrrea, Maria Cristina Zindel Deboni, Júlia Gomes Lúcio de Araújo, Beatriz Campos Pereira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To present and validate a digital visual scale for evaluating mucosal wound repair after mandibular third molar extraction. The research seeks to establish a standard-based tool to improve communication in clinical practice and research by reducing subjectivity in postoperative assessments. Materials and methods A digital image scale using four clinical inflammatory stages (Scores 0 to 3) of recovering oral mucosa of tooth extractions sites was construct. Employing electronic forms ( n = 300) were sent to dentists to assess agreement with the consensus score, and construct validity in six tooth extraction mucosal wounds examined by specialists or not. Construct validation involved specialists who evaluated the scale’s utility, graphic quality, and clinical significance via a 5-point Likert scale. There was a total of eighty-three responses for the agreement consensus, and sixty-seven for construct validation. Results The scale demonstrated a “fair” inter-rater agreement with a Fleiss’ Kappa of 0.3018. The average agreement was 64.3%, with high agreement (> 80%) for advanced repair stages (Score 3) and greater variability for intermediate stages (Scores 1 and 2). Validation results showed high acceptance, with 96.6% of participants agreeing on the tool’s utility for standardization. There was agreement between specialists and general practitioners. The initial scores may require further descriptive refinement to reduce interpretive overlap but under observer’s calibration it can be used across different dental specialties. Conclusions The proposed digital scale showed high professional acceptance and potential usefulness for standardizing the assessment of mucosal healing after third molar surgery. Clinical relevance By providing a standardized visual reference, this scale facilitates the early detection of healing deviations or postoperative complications and rationalizes clinical documentation in professional practice.

Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 30(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.